IT AI Index

Index › Products › Dragos · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Dragos

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dragos was named 2 times in BAS and 1 other category, where Cymulate led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market36 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In bas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dragos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Breach and attack simulation	Security operations	0%	36 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24%
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	79 of 119	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dragos yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dragos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For Industrial/Manufacturing Security: Choose Dragos.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · BAS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dragos, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dragos was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence2 of 41Not among the top eight

Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud2 of 41Not among the top eight

Anomali ThreatStream2 of 40Not among the top eight

ThreatConnect2 of 40Not among the top eight

Cymulate1 of 41Not among the top eight

Darktrace1 of 41Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence1 of 41Not among the top eight

AttackIQ1 of 40Not among the top eight

Cato Networks1 of 40Not among the top eight

Cisco Secure Network Analytics1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dragos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Dragos and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ciopages.com2

csoonline.com2

upguard.com2

zendikt.com2

aicostadvisory.com1

analyst1.com1

anomali.com1

any.run1

bitsight.com1

checkthat.ai1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Dragos came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/threat-intelligence-platform2

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors2

zendikt.com/top-10-threat-intelligence-software2

aicostadvisory.com/tool/dragos1

analyst1.com/cyberpedia/tip-requirements-checklist1

anomali.com/blog/best-operational-threat-intelligence-platforms-for-enterprises1

any.run/cybersecurity-blog/enterprise-threat-intelligence-guide1

bitsight.com/guides/best-cyber-threat-intelligence-platforms-for-global-enterprises-and-so1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

dragos.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dragos takes 0% of first choices and Cymulate takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “breach and attack simulation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “breach and attack simulation platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 9,960 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 9,894 · 123 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 6,112
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

5 ads · 5 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2025, as Phosphorus Cybersecurity Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 5 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 36 of 74 in BAS

Segment leader

24%

Cymulate

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on dragos.com

782

subdomains included

Content

514

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 64

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	402	21	2026-10-01	BAS, XDR
News or press	82	2	2026-09-21	SIEM, Cyber risk quant
Report or ebook	9	3	2026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event	6	0	2025-08-20
Conference or event	6	0	2024-09-23
Glossary or explainer	4	0	2024-10-21
Comparison	2	0	2019-11-13
Podcast or video	2	0	2026-06-24
Case study	1	0	2025-08-20

Most recent

2026-10-01Mtsa device security blog
2026-09-30Xot software supply chain security blog
2026-09-28Dragos appliance datasheet report or ebook
2026-09-24Vl prosperity mtsa maritime cybersecurity blog
2026-09-23Xot visibility beyond asset inventory blog
2026-09-21Dragos acquires netrise and runzero news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dragos.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Dragos

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Dragos is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Your Partner in OT Cybersecurity
dragos.com
For: critical infrastructure
dragos.com
Free plan or trial: free demo dragos.com/partners
Hosting: the AmericasAsia-PacificEuropethe Middle East
Customers named: Littleton Electric Light & Water Department (LELWD)OUCKoch IndustriesThe Boston Beer CompanyTrinity River Authority of Texas
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications

What Dragos's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: dragos.com, dragos.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dragos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dragos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dragos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Dragos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dragos, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.