IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › DeployHQ · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

DeployHQ

16Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CI/CD for small business buyers
Rank 14 of 45 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 55
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market14 of 45
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DeployHQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CI/CD platformsDeveloper platform0%14 of 450%3under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DeployHQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DeployHQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“DeployHQ and CircleCI are also affordable options” Llama 4 Maverick · CI/CD · budget prompt · alternative
“Cheapest Simple Managed Tool: DeployHQ” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CI/CD · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DeployHQ, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DeployHQ was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GitHub Actions16 of 1616Not in the top three
Jenkins14 of 160Not in the top three
CircleCI13 of 160Not in the top three
GitLab CI/CD13 of 160Not in the top three
Bitbucket Pipelines2 of 160Not in the top three
Buildkite2 of 160Not in the top three
Dagger2 of 160Not in the top three
JetBrains TeamCity2 of 160Not in the top three
Semaphore2 of 160Not in the top three
Vercel2 of 160Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DeployHQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named DeployHQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deployhq.comYour site15
saaspedia.dev14
toolradar.com12
devopsness.com7
checkthat.ai6
thectoclub.com5
blog.jetbrains.com4
dev.to4
topickz.com4
devopsplatforms.com3

Fifty-nine of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming DeployHQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

deployhq.com/blog/best-ci-cd-software-top-10-tools-to-know-in-202515
saaspedia.dev/posts/best-ci-cd-platforms14
toolradar.com/blog/best-ci-cd-tools12
devopsness.com/blog/best-cicd-platforms7
toolradar.com/best/ci-cd/for/small-businesses7
checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-ci-cd-tools6
thectoclub.com/tools/best-ci-cd-tools5
topickz.com/list/best-cicd-platforms-for-small-teams4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DeployHQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DeployHQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at deployhq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack