Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 39
1 category · Named, not rankedDeployHQ
9Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DeployHQ was named 1 time in CI/CD, where GitHub Actions led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 41
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 43
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named DeployHQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI/CD platforms | Developer platform | 0% | 22 of 43 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 68% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, DeployHQ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CI/CD · by segment
Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI/CD | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 22 of 43 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated DeployHQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated DeployHQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“DeployHQ if you primarily deploy web applications and want simplicity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CI/CD · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as DeployHQ, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DeployHQ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as DeployHQ, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DeployHQ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DeployHQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named DeployHQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
deployhq.comYour site9
blog.jetbrains.com8
checkthat.ai5
semaphore.io5
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com4
dupple.com4
learn.g2.com4
toolradar.com4
dev.to3
devtoollab.com3
Forty of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming DeployHQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
deployhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, DeployHQ takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Actions takes 68%.ShowHide
Search and answers
deployhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, DeployHQ takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Actions takes 68%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ci/cd platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ci/cd platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“deployhq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,215 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,580 · 62 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,911
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 43 in CI/CD
Segment leader
68%
GitHub Actions
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on deployhq.com
3,006
subdomains included
Content
1,512
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,139
Product · Integration
50 · 30
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 826 | 27 | 2026-09-22 | AI coding, Feature flags | |
| Report or ebook | 430 | 0 | 2026-03-04 | ||
| Comparison | 102 | 6 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 96 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 0 | 2026-03-13 | ||
| Case study | 16 | 0 | 2025-10-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2017-10-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Deploy nextjs static site to deployhq static hosting blog
- 2026-09-222026 blog
- 2026-09-2209 blog
- 2026-09-22Archive blog
- 2026-09-18Deploy astro site to deployhq static hosting blog
- 2026-09-18Deployhq managed vps vs linode comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page deployhq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow DeployHQ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
DeployHQ is its own company.ShowHide
The company
DeployHQ is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated deployment platform for web applications. Deploy code from Git repositories to servers with zero downtime.
- For
- For personal projects
- Price stated
- Unlimited deployments from $9/month deployhq.com
- Starting price
- 9 deployhq.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free tier available with paid plans starting from $10/month deployhq.com
- Integrations claimed
- 15 deployhq.com
- Hosting
- Cloudflare's global edgeDigitalOcean infrastructure
- Customers named
- Social BlendDreamsicleDevelopment AgencyTech StartupDigital AgencyWeb DevelopmentSoftware DevelopmentCircle.so
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications
What DeployHQ's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: deployhq.com, deployhq.com/pricing, deployhq.com/blog/category/security, deployhq.com/features/ai, deployhq.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DeployHQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DeployHQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DeployHQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where DeployHQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name DeployHQ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.