IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › CloudSEK BeVigil · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CloudSEK BeVigil

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CloudSEK BeVigil was named 1 time in ASM, where Intruder led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market103 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CloudSEK BeVigil for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	103 of 104	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudSEK BeVigil yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudSEK BeVigil across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High Caution (Frequent Complaints in Reviews): - CloudSEK BeVigil... Avoid if: You're resource-constrained” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASM · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudSEK BeVigil, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudSEK BeVigil was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wiz1 of 11Not in the top three

Bitsight1 of 10Not in the top three

Censys ASM1 of 10Not in the top three

Cortex Xpanse1 of 10Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management1 of 10Not in the top three

CyCognito1 of 10Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management1 of 10Not in the top three

Qualys1 of 10Not in the top three

Rapid71 of 10Not in the top three

Tenable Attack Surface Management1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudSEK BeVigil. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named CloudSEK BeVigil and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attaxion.com1

aws.amazon.com1

bitsight.com1

blog.ostorlab.co1

blog.qualys.com1

comparisec.com1

crowdstrike.com1

easm.info1

forrester.com1

g2.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming CloudSEK BeVigil came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

attaxion.com/top-external-attack-surface-management-vendors1

aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-6oteh5oqwndco1

aws.amazon.com/marketplace/reviews/reviews-list/B09JSN6CSF1

aws.amazon.com/marketplace/reviews/reviews-list/prodview-6oteh5oqwndco1

bitsight.com/guides/best-external-attack-surface-management-platforms-for-global-enterpris1

bitsight.com/guides/top-5-recorded-future-alternatives-cyber-threat-intelligence-20261

blog.ostorlab.co/best-external-attack-surface-management-platforms-2026.html1

blog.qualys.com/product-tech/2024/09/27/qualys-ranked-as-a-strong-performer-among-top-vend1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudSEK BeVigil's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudSEK BeVigil, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudsek.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.