IT AI Index

Index › Products › CloudRepo · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CloudRepo

17Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CloudRepo was named 3 times in Artifact registries, where JFrog Artifactory led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 86

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 77

under the label threshold

In artifact registries · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CloudRepo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Artifact and container registries	Developer platform	0%	27 of 89	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by JFrog Artifactory at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudRepo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudRepo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Cloud Option (If you cannot self-host) ... CloudRepo offers a generous free tier.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Artifact registries · budget prompt · alternative

“CloudRepo $199/month flat, predictable pricing” Muse Glimmer 30B · Artifact registries · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudRepo, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudRepo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JFrog Artifactory11 of 172Not among the top eight

Sonatype Nexus Repository6 of 176Not among the top eight

GitHub Packages6 of 171Not among the top eight

AWS CodeArtifact5 of 171Not among the top eight

Cloudsmith5 of 170Not among the top eight

Harbor4 of 170Not among the top eight

Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS3 of 171Not among the top eight

Google Artifact Registry3 of 170Not among the top eight

Verdaccio2 of 170Not among the top eight

AWS ECR1 of 171Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudRepo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named CloudRepo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudrepo.ioYour site17

itechguides.com13

sonatype.com10

thectoclub.com9

jfrog.com8

zipdo.co8

gitnux.org5

harness.io5

imaginarycloud.com5

safeguard.sh5

Sixty-eight of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming CloudRepo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudrepo.io/articles/best-artifactory-alternatives11

itechguides.com/best/artifact-repository-software11

thectoclub.com/tools/best-artifact-repository-tools9

sonatype.com/compare/best-artifact-repository-solutions8

zipdo.co/best/artifact-software6

imaginarycloud.com/blog/best-artifact-repository-tools5

sonatype.com/products/pricing5

sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cloudrepo.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CloudRepo takes 0% of first choices and JFrog Artifactory takes 14%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “artifact repository”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best artifact repository”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“cloudrepo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 707 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 267 · 8 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 277
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 27 of 89 in artifact registries

Segment leader

14%

JFrog Artifactory

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cloudrepo.io

249

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	19	1	2026-09-08	Artifact registries
Comparison	10	0	2026-01-14
Glossary or explainer	3	0	2026-01-15

Most recent

2026-09-08Private docker registry hosting comparison blog
2026-03-25Private npm registry guide blog
2026-02-03Stop blaming claude context window optimization blog
2026-01-2010 years of cloudrepo blog
2026-01-15Artifact management guide blog
2026-01-15Helm charts artifact repository guide blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cloudrepo.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow CloudRepo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CloudRepo is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: the predictable-pricing alternative to JFrog Artifactory
cloudrepo.io
For: engineering teams
cloudrepo.io
Price stated: Starter $199 /month; Team $499 /month; Business $799 /month; Scale $1,199 /month cloudrepo.io
Starting price: 199 cloudrepo.io
Free plan or trial: Start your 14-day free trial. No card. cloudrepo.io
Certifications: SOC 2 Certified VendorsAES-256 EncryptionUS Data ResidencyGDPR ReadySOC 2ISO 27001
Hosting: AWS US-West (N. California)US data centersUnited States
Customers named: DreevTwelve Oaks SoftwareKraneware
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What CloudRepo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloudrepo.io, cloudrepo.io/pricing, cloudrepo.io/trust, cloudrepo.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudRepo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudRepo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CloudRepo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CloudRepo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CloudRepo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.