AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CHEQ · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

CHEQ

12Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CHEQ was named 3 times in Bot management, where Cloudflare Bot Management led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 84
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 83
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In bot management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CHEQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Bot managementNetwork and edge0%20 of 830%3under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare Bot Management at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CHEQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CHEQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CHEQ (Best for B2B lead integrity & marketing protection)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Bot management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CHEQ, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CHEQ was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DataDome12 of 123Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Bot Management8 of 124Not among the top eight
Imperva Advanced Bot Protection7 of 120Not among the top eight
Akamai Bot Manager6 of 120Not among the top eight
Arkose Labs5 of 120Not among the top eight
HUMAN Security4 of 120Not among the top eight
Kasada4 of 120Not among the top eight
Radware Bot Manager3 of 120Not among the top eight
cside3 of 120Not among the top eight
Cequence Security2 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CHEQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named CHEQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

indusface.com8
cside.com7
forrester.com7
g2.com7
radware.com7
securityboulevard.com7
cequence.ai6
expertinsights.com6
techtimes.com5
cloudflare.com4

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming CHEQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

indusface.com/blog/top-bot-management-software8
cside.com/blog/best-bot-detection-software7
expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-bot-detection-and-protection-solutions6
forrester.com/report/the-forrester-wave-tm-bot-management-software-q3-2024/RES1810136
radware.com/cyberpedia/bot-management/best-botnet-protection-tools5
securityboulevard.com/2024/02/13-top-bot-management-software-in-the-market-for-20245
engagelab.com/blog/bot-detection-tools4
techtimes.com/articles/319760/20260706/best-bot-detection-mitigation-software-2026.htm4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cheq.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CHEQ takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare Bot Management takes 56%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “bot management solution”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “bot management solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“cheq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
55 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,629 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,523 · 64 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,401
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 15 clicks and $1,062 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
50 ads · 50 text · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as CHEQ AI TECHNOLOGIES (2018) LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 41 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 83 in bot management
Segment leader
56%
Cloudflare Bot Management
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
12 answers
Its own site cited
in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cheq.ai
696
subdomains included
Content
361
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
21 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog244112026-09-24
Glossary or explainer2902025-09-17
Case study2422026-08-12
Webinar or virtual event1812026-07-30
Conference or event1322026-08-25
Podcast or video1302025-08-01
Report or ebook1212026-09-24
Comparison512026-09-01
Template or tool202024-06-18
News or press102021-12-14

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cheq.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as CHEQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CHEQ; a claim can dispute any of them.
CHEQ Essentials 1

Follow CHEQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CHEQ is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Go-to-Market Security Platform
cheq.ai
For
go-to-market security & success
cheq.ai
Free plan or trial
Get a free scan cheq.ai/solutions/bot-management
Certifications
SOC 2 compliantSOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 42001GDPR complianceGDPR CompliantCCPA Compliant
Hosting
Tel-AvivNew YorkTokyoLondon
Customers named
Boundless LearningTeam InternetLinkvertiseThe Good GuysSpace NKCventHowden JoineryTipalti
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations

What CHEQ's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cheq.ai, cheq.ai/trust, cheq.ai/solutions/bot-management, cheq.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CHEQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CHEQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CHEQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CHEQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CHEQ, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cheq.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.