| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 0% | 62 of 86 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22% | |
| Managed detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 23 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose BlueVoyant if you want high-level automation and autonomous defense.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · MDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“BlueVoyant Sky DRP is a standout for vendor-focused risk visibility and managed services” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Most enterprise-grade platforms (ZeroFox, Recorded Future, BlueVoyant) are quote-based and typically cost $20,000 to $50,000+ per year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named BlueVoyant and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming BlueVoyant came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 524 | undated | MDR, TPRM | ||
| News or press | 211 | undated | MDR, TPRM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | undated | Endpoint protection, MDR | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Case study | 5 | undated | MDR | ||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | XDR, MDR | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | SOAR, TPRM |
Every page bluevoyant.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What BlueVoyant's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: bluevoyant.com, trust.bluevoyant.com, bluevoyant.com/solutions/visibl, bluevoyant.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BlueVoyant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BlueVoyant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BlueVoyant by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: