AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › BlueVoyant · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

BlueVoyant

9Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BlueVoyant was named 4 times in DRP and 1 other category, where UpGuard BreachSight led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BlueVoyant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital risk protectionSecurity operations0%62 of 8633%3under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%
Managed detection and responseSecurity operations0%23 of 670%1under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BlueVoyant yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BlueVoyant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose BlueVoyant if you want high-level automation and autonomous defense.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · MDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“BlueVoyant Sky DRP is a standout for vendor-focused risk visibility and managed services” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Most enterprise-grade platforms (ZeroFox, Recorded Future, BlueVoyant) are quote-based and typically cost $20,000 to $50,000+ per year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BlueVoyant, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BlueVoyant was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Recorded Future4 of 90Not among the top eight
ZeroFox4 of 90Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete3 of 93Not among the top eight
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response3 of 90Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon3 of 90Not among the top eight
Have I Been Pwned3 of 90Not among the top eight
Kroll Responder3 of 90Not among the top eight
UpGuard BreachSight3 of 90Not among the top eight
Guardz2 of 92Not among the top eight
Digital Shadows2 of 91Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BlueVoyant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named BlueVoyant and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on bluevoyant.com
970
subdomains included
Content
784
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
39 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog524undatedMDR, TPRM
News or press211undatedMDR, TPRM
Glossary or explainer17undatedEndpoint protection, MDR
Webinar or virtual event13undated
Report or ebook8undated
Case study5undatedMDR
Comparison4undatedXDR, MDR
Conference or event2undatedSOAR, TPRM
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bluevoyant.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as BlueVoyant

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BlueVoyant; a claim can dispute any of them.
Fortra/BlueVoyant 1

Follow BlueVoyant

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BlueVoyant is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Global leader in AI-driven managed cyber defense for your network, supply chain, and digital footprint.
For
organizations
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022ISO 27701:2019UK Cyber Essentials PlusISO 27001 Certificate (July 2025)ISO 27701 Certificate (July 2025)SOC 2 Type 2 Report (December 2025)Cyber Essentials Plus Certificate (September 2026)
Hosting
US/EU/UK regional hosting availableUS
Customers named
IFX PaymentsSnappiODEON Cinemas GroupState of California
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What BlueVoyant's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: bluevoyant.com, trust.bluevoyant.com, bluevoyant.com/solutions/visibl, bluevoyant.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BlueVoyant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BlueVoyant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BlueVoyant by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where BlueVoyant is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name BlueVoyant, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bluevoyant.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.