IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Bitsight-style ratings tools · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Bitsight-style ratings tools

1Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bitsight-style ratings tools was named 1 time in TPRM, where UpGuard led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market50 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bitsight-style ratings tools for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Third-party risk management	Security operations	0%	50 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitsight-style ratings tools yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitsight-style ratings tools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitsight-style ratings tools, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitsight-style ratings tools was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UpGuard1 of 11Not in the top three

SmartSuite1 of 10Not in the top three

Vanta1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitsight-style ratings tools. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Bitsight-style ratings tools and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1

complyjet.com1

ecommercefastlane.com1

esecurityplanet.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

guideflow.com1

learn.g2.com1

mitratech.com1

panorays.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Bitsight-style ratings tools came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-tprm-tools/1263930021

complyjet.com/blog/best-vendor-risk-management-software1

ecommercefastlane.com/best-third-party-risk-management-software-20261

esecurityplanet.com/products/third-party-risk-management1

g2.com/categories/third-party-supplier-risk-management/small-business1

gartner.com/reviews/market/third-party-risk-management-technology-solutions1

guideflow.com/blog/third-party-risk-management-software1

learn.g2.com/best-third-party-risk-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitsight-style ratings tools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitsight-style ratings tools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitsight.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.