Index › Products › Bee360 · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Bee360

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bee360 was named 4 times in IT financial mgmt and 1 other category, where Nicus ITFM Platform led with 9%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market50 of 159

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 108

under the label threshold

In it financial mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bee360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	50 of 159	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	0%	66 of 113	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bee360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bee360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bee360 (4.5 for integrations) per Gartner” Grok 4.1 Fast · IT financial mgmt · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bee360, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bee360 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IBM Apptio Cloudability5 of 62Not among the top eight

ServiceNow IT Financial Management3 of 60Not among the top eight

Nicus Software2 of 61Not among the top eight

IBM Apptio2 of 60Not among the top eight

Nicus ITFM Platform2 of 60Not among the top eight

Planview Portfolios2 of 60Not among the top eight

CloudZero1 of 61Not among the top eight

Serviceware Financial1 of 61Not among the top eight

Acumatica1 of 60Not among the top eight

ApptioOne1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bee360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Bee360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com6

blog.invgate.com3

devopsschool.com3

swanintelligence.com3

thectoclub.com3

worldmetrics.org3

bigtime.net2

cfoconnect.eu2

ciopages.com2

external.pi.gpi.aws.gartner.com2

No domain is on file for Bee360, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/it-financial-management-tools4

blog.invgate.com/itfm-software3

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-it-financial-management-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison3

swanintelligence.com/best-itfm-providers3

bigtime.net/blogs/financial-management-software2

cfoconnect.eu/resources/finance-insights/best-cfo-tools-20252

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/it-financial-management2

gurukulgalaxy.com/blog/top-10-it-financial-management-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Bee360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bee360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bee360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bee360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bee360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bee360, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.