Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 47 → 10 of 78
1 category · Named, not rankedAmnic
15Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Amnic was named 7 times in FinOps, where Vantage led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 83
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 76
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 73
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In finops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Amnic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 25 of 76 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Vantage at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Amnic held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · FinOps · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 24 of 70
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 16 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FinOps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 25 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Amnic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Amnic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Multi-cloud needs: Third-party tools like Vantage or Amnic” MiniMax M2.5 · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Amnic is another strong contender.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FinOps · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amnic, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amnic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Amnic, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amnic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amnic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Amnic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
amnic.comYour site14
cloudaware.com11
cloudzero.com10
learn.g2.com6
openmetal.io6
vantage.sh6
g2.com4
nops.io4
axis-intelligence.com3
cloudbolt.io3
Fifty-three of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Amnic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
amnic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amnic takes 0% of first choices and Vantage takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
amnic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Amnic takes 0% of first choices and Vantage takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cloud cost management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cloud cost management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“amnic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 17 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,348 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,756 · 35 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,045
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 76 in finops
Segment leader
45%
Vantage
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on amnic.com
564
subdomains included
Content
381
counted in the table below
Documentation
73
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 290 | 20 | 2026-07-09 | FinOps, LLM gateways | |
| Glossary or explainer | 36 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Comparison | 31 | 2 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 9 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Case study | 6 | 6 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2025-09-17 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-07 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-07Ebook landing page report or ebook
- 2026-08-07Webinar registration webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-07The futurescape conclave rsvp no conference or event
- 2026-08-07The futurescape conclave register conference or event
- 2026-08-07The futurescape conclave conference or event
- 2026-08-07Finops x san diego conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page amnic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Amnic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Amnic is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Amnic is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Agents and Agentic AI Platform for FinOps
- For
- CTO, FinOps, SRE, CFO
- Price stated
- View Pricing amnic.com
- Starting price
- $999/mo amnic.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start with a 30-day no-cost trial. Read-only. No commitment. amnic.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II - CompliantISO 27001 - CompliantGDPR - Compliant
- Customers named
- UniOpen FinancialMetamapJiffy.aiNanonetsLambdaTest
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Amnic's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: amnic.com, amnic.com/pricing, amnic.com/security, amnic.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amnic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amnic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amnic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Amnic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Amnic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.