IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Cloudaware · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Cloudaware

69Judge labels
3First choices
11Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in FinOps for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 53 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cloudaware for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cloud security posture managementCloud and infrastructure2%7 of 539%11accepted challenger
Cloud cost managementCloud and infrastructure0%22 of 7920%10accepted challenger
IT asset managementIT operations and endpoint0%33 of 6125%4under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cloudaware yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cloudaware across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast02114
Mistral Small10012
DeepSeek V4 Flash01304
Llama 4 Maverick01405
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX03014
MiniMax M2.500011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels1
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wiz and Cloudaware are the top CSPM tools” Mistral Small · CSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloudaware is useful when cloud posture needs CMDB context, ownership, inventory, compliance reporting, and operational evidence.” Llama 4 Maverick · CSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“You need granular asset-to-cost mapping and want cost alerts and actions to flow directly into your operational workflows.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“a strong fit if your main pain is governance, ownership, exemptions, remediation proof, and audit evidence” Perplexity Sonar · CSPM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“third-party platforms like Snyk or Cloudaware may be worth the investment. However, for most small businesses... native tools and open-source solutions is the most cost-effective strategy.” Mistral Small · CSPM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Overwhelming UI/navigation, integration friction in complex environments, and high pricing for startups/small teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Several tools, including Cloudaware and CloudHealth (now VMware Aria Cost), have been criticized for being expensive” MiniMax M2.5 · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Cloudaware” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cloudaware, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudaware was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wiz23 of 6910Not in the top three
Flexera One22 of 693Not in the top three
CloudZero19 of 691Not in the top three
Prisma Cloud18 of 692Not in the top three
Vantage17 of 695Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender for Cloud17 of 693Not in the top three
IBM Apptio Cloudability16 of 695Not in the top three
ServiceNow IT Asset Management14 of 699Not in the top three
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth13 of 690Not in the top three
Prowler12 of 697Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cloudaware. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 69 answers that named Cloudaware and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudaware.comYour site69
gartner.com35
cyberpress.org23
cloudzero.com19
cybersecuritynews.com19
expertinsights.com17
g2.com17
gbhackers.com15
complyjet.com13
learn.g2.com13

171 of the 240 domain citations in answers naming Cloudaware came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cloudaware

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cloudaware; a claim can dispute any of them.
CloudAware 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudaware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudaware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudaware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack