| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 2% | 7 of 53 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 22 of 79 | 20% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| IT asset management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 33 of 61 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Wiz and Cloudaware are the top CSPM tools” Mistral Small · CSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloudaware is useful when cloud posture needs CMDB context, ownership, inventory, compliance reporting, and operational evidence.” Llama 4 Maverick · CSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“You need granular asset-to-cost mapping and want cost alerts and actions to flow directly into your operational workflows.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“a strong fit if your main pain is governance, ownership, exemptions, remediation proof, and audit evidence” Perplexity Sonar · CSPM · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“third-party platforms like Snyk or Cloudaware may be worth the investment. However, for most small businesses... native tools and open-source solutions is the most cost-effective strategy.” Mistral Small · CSPM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Overwhelming UI/navigation, integration friction in complex environments, and high pricing for startups/small teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Several tools, including Cloudaware and CloudHealth (now VMware Aria Cost), have been criticized for being expensive” MiniMax M2.5 · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Cloudaware” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 69 answers that named Cloudaware and are not a share of its labels.
171 of the 240 domain citations in answers naming Cloudaware came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudaware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudaware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudaware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.