Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 26 of 78
1 category · RankedProsperOps
43Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in FinOps for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ProsperOps →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 83
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market9 of 76
2%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 73
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In finops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ProsperOps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 2% | 9 of 76 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ProsperOps held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · FinOps · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 70
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 11 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FinOps | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 9 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ProsperOps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ProsperOps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“CloudZero and ProsperOps are top recommendations due to their automation, granular insights, and strong ROI” Mistral Small · FinOps · direct prompt · first choice
“Focuses on saving money via Savings Plans/Reserved Instances and automation around commitment usage.” Perplexity Sonar · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Automated AWS commitments/savings | % of savings model | High for AWS-heavy” Grok 4.20 · FinOps · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“also consider a focused optimizer like ProsperOps, now part of Flexera” GPT-6 Luna · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProsperOps, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProsperOps was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProsperOps, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProsperOps was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProsperOps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 43 answers that named ProsperOps and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cloudaware.com33
cloudzero.com30
finout.io20
amnic.com16
g2.com16
pointfive.co16
nops.io15
openmetal.io15
vantage.sh14
usage.ai13
188 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming ProsperOps came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
prosperops.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProsperOps takes 2% of first choices and Vantage takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
prosperops.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProsperOps takes 2% of first choices and Vantage takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cloud cost management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cloud cost management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“prosperops”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,226 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,669 · 53 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,379
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 76 in finops
Segment leader
45%
Vantage
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 43 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on prosperops.com
632
subdomains included
Content
444
counted in the table below
Documentation
119
Product · Integration
10 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 286 | 9 | 2026-09-02 | FinOps, ETL | |
| Conference or event | 52 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 27 | undated | FinOps | ||
| Podcast or video | 27 | 0 | 2025-12-03 | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | FinOps | |
| Case study | 18 | 0 | 2026-03-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Microsoft ignite 2026 meet with prosperops conference or event
- 2026-09-22Ignite 2026 happy hour conference or event
- 2026-09-22Money2020 2026 dinner conference or event
- 2026-09-17Kubecon 2026 meet with prosperops conference or event
- 2026-09-02New azure intelligent showback blog
- 2026-08-11Darts and drinks with prosperops flexera shi conference or event
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 9, 2026 to November 12, 2026KubeCon North America: Meet with ProsperOpsSalt Lake City · sponsors
- November 17, 2026 to November 19, 2026Microsoft Ignite 2026Moscone Center, San Francisco, US · sponsors
Last twelve months
- October 18, 2026ProsperOps Dinner at Money20/20estiatorio Milos (Inside the Venetian), Las Vegas · hosted
- April 21, 2026Google Cloud Next 2025: FinOps Community CelebrationRí Rá Irish Pub (Mandalay Bay) · took part
- December 1, 2025 to December 5, 2025AWS re:Invent 2025: Meet with ProsperOpsVenetian Resort, Las Vegas · sponsored
As the event pages on prosperops.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page prosperops.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ProsperOps
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ProsperOps is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ProsperOps is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automatic Cost Optimization for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud; a unified FinOps automation platform that synchronizes rate and workload optimization to reduce cloud costs, waste, and risk.
- For
- Finance teams, platform and SRE teams, FinOps teams, and private equity.
- Price stated
- Free Savings Analysis; Autonomous Discount Management (ADM) takes a small percentage of the realized savings, as determined by your provider’s billing system; Autonomous Resource Management (ARM) charges a flat fee per managed resource, per month; the pricing model is directly tied to cloud savings generated (versus cloud spend) prosperops.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Savings Analysis prosperops.com
- Customers named
- CollibraCoinbaseWebflowInspired eLearningCleverTapCapita plcMoveworksPsychwire
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What ProsperOps's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: prosperops.com, prosperops.com/pricing, trust.prosperops.com, prosperops.com/solutions/finops, prosperops.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProsperOps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProsperOps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProsperOps by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ProsperOps is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProsperOps, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.