AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Akto · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Akto

24Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in API security for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 93 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In api security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Akto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
API security platformsSecurity operations2%13 of 930%7under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%
AI security platformsSecurity operations2%22 of 2330%1under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Akto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Akto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels3
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prompt Security (SentinelOne) and Akto are top recommendations” Mistral Small · AI security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best Open-Source API Security Platform: Akto” Gemini 3.5 Flash · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“Akto (API Discovery & Protection) ... Best for: Teams that want discovery + protection in one place with a lighter footprint” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For a free starting point, Akto's open-source tool ships 1,000+ security tests.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · API security · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Akto, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akto was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Akamai API Security15 of 242Not among the top eight
Salt Security14 of 241Not among the top eight
42Crunch11 of 243Not among the top eight
Cloudflare API Shield11 of 242Not among the top eight
Wallarm API Security8 of 241Not among the top eight
StackHawk8 of 240Not among the top eight
Escape7 of 243Not among the top eight
Zuplo5 of 243Not among the top eight
Traceable AI5 of 241Not among the top eight
Indusface AppTrana5 of 240Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Akto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Akto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

beaglesecurity.com13
indusface.com13
learn.g2.com13
zuplo.com10
akto.ioYour site9
g2.com9
appsecsanta.com8
gravitee.io8
radware.com8
gartner.com7

Eighty-nine of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Akto came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

akto.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Akto takes 2% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “api security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “api security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“akto”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 978 a month
Searches its site ranks for
853 · 9 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,396
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
18 ads · 13 text, 5 image · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as Akto Io, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 16 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 93 in API security
Segment leader
12%
Aikido Security
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
24 answers
Its own site cited
in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on akto.io
1,680
subdomains included
Content
677
counted in the table below
Documentation
340
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog486972026-10-02DAST, DLP
Conference or event7562026-10-02DAST
Glossary or explainer5712026-10-02DAST, SAST
Comparison47172026-10-02AI security
Case study302024-02-13
Webinar or virtual event302024-02-27
Template or tool322026-10-02
Report or ebook222026-10-02
Podcast or video102026-06-30

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on akto.io state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page akto.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name DAST (36); 3 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Akto

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Akto is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
#1 AI Agent Security Solution for Modern AI Security Teams
For
Modern AI Security Teams
Price stated
usage based Enterprise-grade pricing akto.io/pricing
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Akto's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: akto.io, akto.io/pricing, trust.akto.io, akto.io/platform-tour, akto.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Akto is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Akto, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at akto.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.