Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 of 70, unchanged
Aiven · 1 category · Named, not rankedAiven for PostgreSQL
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Aiven for PostgreSQL was named 1 time in Managed databases, where Amazon RDS led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 74
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 82
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In managed databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Aiven for PostgreSQL for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 0% | 24 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Aiven for PostgreSQL held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Managed databases · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 of 72, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed databases | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Aiven for PostgreSQL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Aiven for PostgreSQL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need a dedicated CPU and flat pricing, Aiven offers the best free tier among managed Postgres options.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed databases · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Aiven for PostgreSQL, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aiven for PostgreSQL was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Aiven for PostgreSQL, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aiven for PostgreSQL was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aiven for PostgreSQL. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Aiven for PostgreSQL and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
azure.microsoft.com2
cloud.google.com2
learn.microsoft.com2
abbacustechnologies.com1
aiven.ioYour site1
aws.amazon.com1
azure.cn1
bytebase.com1
cloudchipr.com1
cloudinsight.cc1
Twelve of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Aiven for PostgreSQL came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
aiven.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Aiven for PostgreSQL takes 0% of first choices and Amazon RDS takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
aiven.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Aiven for PostgreSQL takes 0% of first choices and Amazon RDS takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “managed relational database service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “managed relational database services”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- aiven.io shared with Aiven's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,024 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,365 · 213 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,556
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $59 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 82 in managed databases
Segment leader
45%
Amazon RDS
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Aiven for PostgreSQL
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Aiven is the company behind Aiven for PostgreSQL.ShowHide
The company
Aiven is the company behind Aiven for PostgreSQL.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Aiven
- Aiven for Apache Kafka
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Managed PostgreSQL as a service
- For
- developers
- Price stated
- Free $0/month; Developer $5/month; Startup Starting from $75/month; Business Starting from $180/month aiven.io/postgresql
- Starting price
- 5/month aiven.io/postgresql
- Free plan or trial
- Free $0/month aiven.io/postgresql
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRSOC2ISO27001PCI-DSSGDPR compliance
- Hosting
- Google Cloud PlatformAmazon Web ServicesMicrosoft AzureDigitalOceanUpCloudSelected cloud regions around the worldAsia, Bangalore (blr)Asia, Singapore (sgp)
- Customers named
- La RedouteOVO EnergySupermetrics
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Aiven for PostgreSQL's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: aiven.io/postgresql, aiven.io/free-postgresql-database, aiven.io/pricing/postgresql. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aiven for PostgreSQL's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aiven for PostgreSQL, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aiven for PostgreSQL by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Aiven for PostgreSQL is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aiven for PostgreSQL, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.