AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › WAF › ModSecurity vs AWS WAF
Web application firewalls · October 2026 Edition

ModSecurity vs AWS WAF

Zero of fourteen models named ModSecurity first on the direct prompt; one named AWS WAF. ModSecurity was named by twelve of the fourteen models and AWS WAF by fourteen and ModSecurity carries 26 labels and AWS WAF 54, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ModSecurity

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

AWS WAF

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate54%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2654A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ModSecurity reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cloudflare WAF was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Cloudflare WAF vs ModSecurity · Cloudflare WAF vs AWS WAF · ModSecurity vs Radware Cloud WAF

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the web application firewalls page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ModSecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAWS WAF
Direct011 against ModSecurity · 1 against AWS WAF
Paraphrase012 against AWS WAF
Comparative003 against ModSecurity
Budget-constrained402 against ModSecurity · 1 against AWS WAF
Scale-constrained002 against AWS WAF
Negative008 against ModSecurity · 5 against AWS WAF
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, ModSecurity and AWS WAF were named in the same answer forty-four times, of the 58 answers naming ModSecurity and the 181 naming AWS WAF. In those answers AWS WAF took the first choice one time and ModSecurity two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ModSecurity and AWS WAF stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ModSecurity AWS WAF first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ModSecurity on the left and AWS WAF on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ModSecurity and AWS WAF stood in it.

AWS WAF first, ModSecurity not the choice

1 of 14 modelsModSecurity was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5AWS WAF, Cloudflare WAF

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Grok 4.1 FastCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, Azure Application Gateway WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF, Radware Cloud WAF, Sucuri WAF
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Qwen 3.7 FlashCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Kimi K2Cloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
GLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
GPT-6 LunaCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Azure Front Door Premium with WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCloudflare WAF alternatives: Imperva Cloud WAF
Perplexity SonarBarracuda WAF alternatives: Akamai App & API Protector, Cloudflare WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Mistral SmallBarracuda Web Application Firewall alternatives: Cloudflare WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF, Reblaze WAAP
Llama 4 MaverickRadware Cloud WAF
MiniMax M2.5Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare WAF alternatives: OpenAppSec / Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Muse Glimmer 30BCloudflare WAF alternatives: Barracuda WAF, Sucuri WAF

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
AWS WAF leads by two points.
AWS WAF2%#3 of 9
ModSecurity0%#9 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: ModSecurity leads at mid-market.
ModSecurity8%#2 of 11
AWS WAF4%#3 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: AWS WAF leads at enterprise.
AWS WAF2%#6 of 9
ModSecurity0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ModSecurity

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“ModSecurity, the classic open-source WAF engine, has reached End-of-Life (EOL).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid/Be cautious with: Unpatched ModSecurity v3 versions” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-47947) in ModSecurity, a widely deployed open-source WAF, allows attackers to crash systems through denial of service attacks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want the absolute lowest cost and have internal sysadmin skills: go with ModSecurity (free) + OWASP CRS.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“best-value WAF is usually an open-source stack: ModSecurity + OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS)” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“ModSecurity with OWASP CRS is the de-facto standard free engine.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about AWS WAF

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“using the provider's native WAF (e.g., AWS WAF) is highly convenient... but may require more manual configuration and rule writing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“AWS WAF, for example, has an 8 KB inspection limit on Application Load Balancers and AppSync; gRPC request bodies aren't inspected” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“The WAFFLED results show parsing discrepancies affect AWS, Azure, Cloud Armor, Cloudflare and ModSecurity alike.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cloudflare or AWS WAF usually give the quickest time-to-value, decent out-of-the-box rules, and scalable bot mitigation” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with either Cloudflare WAF ... or AWS WAF (if you're already AWS-based)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Consider managed WAF services (AWS WAF, Azure WAF, Cloudflare) for better maintenance and faster patching” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.