Zero of twelve models named Fortinet first on the direct prompt; one named Palo Alto Networks. Fortinet was named by eleven of the twelve models and Palo Alto Networks by twelve and Fortinet carries 19 labels and Palo Alto Networks 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the next-generation firewalls page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“20+ CVEs on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog — among the highest for any firewall vendor ... Fortinet and SonicWall currently require the most aggressive hardening” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious with Palo Alto and Fortinet; they are top-tier platforms, but you must be prepared to patch them constantly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fortinet is currently the most deployed NGFW globally, holding a significant market share (~50%). It is widely recognized for its price-performance ratio.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Fortinet is widely considered the best choice for mid-sized businesses that want high performance and robust security without paying premium-tier pricing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Fortinet FortiGate (appliance or virtual) is the best all-around choice due to its balance of performance, features, and cost.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Earned "Caution" in NSS Labs 2025 (lowest security effectiveness at 46.37%, failed critical network/transport-layer evasions)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Highest cost. Both the hardware and the annual subscription renewals are significantly more expensive than competitors.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Palo Alto is usually favored for deepest application visibility and advanced threat prevention... often positioned as the most feature-rich option” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks is usually the best overall choice if you want top-tier security, strong app visibility, and a mature management stack.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Industry leader with powerful threat detection, AI-driven analytics, cloud-native firewalling (Prisma), and a strong ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.