Eleven of twelve models named Fortinet FortiGate first on the direct prompt; one named Palo Alto Networks. Both were named by all twelve models and Fortinet FortiGate carries 38 labels and Palo Alto Networks 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the next-generation firewalls page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Older models of Fortigate, Palo Alto, and other NGFW devices can become security liabilities if not regularly updated.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Caution" in NSS Labs 2025 (79.24% effectiveness). Massive CVE volume (100+ tracked)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Caution (High Maintenance)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“The Overall Best Value & Price-Performance: Fortinet FortiGate ... go with the Fortinet FortiGate. It offers the most future-proof scalability” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Fortinet FortiGate (Series 600) ... market leader for mid-sized businesses because it offers the best price-to-performance ratio” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a 500-person company, Fortinet FortiGate is frequently recommended as the sweet spot—enterprise-grade features at mid-market pricing.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Earned "Caution" in NSS Labs 2025 (lowest security effectiveness at 46.37%, failed critical network/transport-layer evasions)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Highest cost. Both the hardware and the annual subscription renewals are significantly more expensive than competitors.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Palo Alto is usually favored for deepest application visibility and advanced threat prevention... often positioned as the most feature-rich option” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks is usually the best overall choice if you want top-tier security, strong app visibility, and a mature management stack.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Industry leader with powerful threat detection, AI-driven analytics, cloud-native firewalling (Prisma), and a strong ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.