AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › SCA › Trivy vs OWASP Dependency-Check
Software composition analysis · October 2026 Edition

Trivy vs OWASP Dependency-Check

Zero of fourteen models named Trivy first on the direct prompt; zero named OWASP Dependency-Check. Trivy was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and OWASP Dependency-Check by fourteen and Trivy carries 27 labels and OWASP Dependency-Check 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Trivy

endorsed leader

Named in eight categories this edition.

OWASP Dependency-Check

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share31%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2735A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Trivy reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Snyk Open Source was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Trivy vs Snyk Open Source · Trivy vs Mend.io · Trivy vs OWASP Dependency-Track

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the software composition analysis page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TrivyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOWASP Dependency-Check
Direct00
Paraphrase911 against Trivy · 1 against OWASP Dependency-Check
Comparative00
Budget-constrained733 against OWASP Dependency-Check
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Trivy · 4 against OWASP Dependency-Check
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Trivy and OWASP Dependency-Check were named in the same answer fifty-six times, of the 224 answers naming Trivy and the 99 naming OWASP Dependency-Check. In those answers OWASP Dependency-Check took the first choice four times and Trivy twenty-seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Trivy and OWASP Dependency-Check stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Trivy OWASP Dependency-Check first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Trivy on the left and OWASP Dependency-Check on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Trivy and OWASP Dependency-Check stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniSnyk Open Source alternatives: FOSSA, OWASP Dependency-Check, OWASP Dependency-Track
Kimi K2Mend.io, Snyk Open Source alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, GitHub Dependabot, Sonatype Lifecycle, Trivy

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mend.io alternatives: Black Duck, Endor Labs, FOSSA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle
Gemini 3.5 FlashAikido Security alternatives: Endor Labs, Mend.io, Snyk Open Source
Perplexity SonarMend.io alternatives: Black Duck, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle
Grok 4.1 FastSnyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
Mistral SmallMend.io alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Insignary Clarity
DeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
Llama 4 MaverickMend.io
Qwen 3.7 FlashMend.io alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Open Source
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Open Source alternatives: Black Duck, Endor Labs, FOSSA, Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
MiniMax M2.5Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle alternatives: Black Duck, FOSSA, GitHub Advanced Security
GPT-6 LunaSnyk Open Source alternatives: GitHub's built-in supply-chain tools, Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
Muse Glimmer 30BMend.io alternatives: Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Trivy leads by three points.
Trivy18%#2 of 14
OWASP Dependency-Check15%#3 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Trivy leads by twenty-four points.
Trivy31%#1 of 17
OWASP Dependency-Check8%#5 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Trivy leads by five points.
Trivy9%#4 of 14
OWASP Dependency-Check4%#10 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Trivy

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“free options like Trivy being the best zero-budget choice but typically requiring more tuning than commercial offerings” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Trivy disclosed a 2026 compromise involving a malicious release and GitHub Action tags, so pin and verify the tooling” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Trivy (from Aqua Security) as the top open-source dependency vulnerability scanner for a mid-sized B2B company.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about OWASP Dependency-Check

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“useful as a free scanner, but I'd avoid treating its results as definitive ... can produce both false positives and false negatives” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“It has a higher false-positive rate than Trivy or Grype (due to CPE-based matching), so it requires more triage time.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Basic scanning, can be noisy, and is often cited as lacking the depth and automation of commercial tools.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“OWASP Dependency-Check is a free, open-source SCA tool that provides basic CVE scanning for teams with limited budgets.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best starting point is usually OWASP Dependency-Check because it is free and open source” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually OWASP Dependency-Check. It's free, open source” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.