AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › API gateways › Tyk vs Apigee
API gateways · October 2026 Edition

Tyk vs Apigee

Two of fourteen models named Tyk first on the direct prompt; one named Apigee. Both were named by all fourteen models and Tyk carries 47 labels and Apigee 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Tyk

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Apigee

criticized challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%28%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4743A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Tyk reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Kong Gateway was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Kong Gateway vs Tyk · Kong Gateway vs Apigee · Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API gateways page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TykFirst choices, of fourteen modelsApigee
Direct213 against Apigee
Paraphrase003 against Apigee
Comparative001 against Apigee
Budget-constrained101 against Apigee
Scale-constrained10
Negative005 against Tyk · 4 against Apigee
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Tyk and Apigee were named in the same answer 149 times, of the 239 answers naming Tyk and the 349 naming Apigee. In those answers Apigee took the first choice fifteen times and Tyk twenty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Tyk and Apigee stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Tyk Apigee first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tyk on the left and Apigee on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Tyk and Apigee stood in it.

Tyk first, Apigee not the choice

2 of 14 modelsApigee was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTyk alternatives: Gravitee, Kong Gateway, Zuplo
Muse Glimmer 30BKong Gateway, Tyk alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management

Apigee first, Tyk an alternative

1 of 14 modelsTyk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmazon API Gateway, Apigee alternatives: Kong Gateway, Tyk

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Azure API Management
Perplexity SonarKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Cleo Integration Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management, Tyk, Zuplo
Mistral SmallZuplo alternatives: Apigee, Axway API Gateway
DeepSeek V4 FlashKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Tyk, Zuplo
GLM 4.7 FlashXKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Tyk, Zuplo
GPT-6 LunaKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Azure API Management

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Amazon API Gateway, Kong Gateway
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Kong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management
MiniMax M2.5Kong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, NGINX, Red Hat 3scale

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Tyk leads by six points.
Tyk6%#4 of 10
Apigee0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Tyk leads by six points.
Tyk8%#4 of 11
Apigee2%#8 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Apigee leads at enterprise.
Apigee38%#1 of 9
Tyk6%#3 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Tyk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Verdict: Cautious — great performance as a proxy, but operational complexity, licensing surprises, and production failure patterns are concerning.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mentions of Kong (2024 incident) and Tyk (early 2025 advisory) tied to overbroad credentials.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Kong (specifically Kong Konnect) and Tyk are widely considered the top contenders"” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Apigee

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“What to Avoid for Mid-Size Budgets - Apigee (Google) — powerful but expensive; pay-as-you-go can reach $400K+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.