Three of fourteen models named Amazon EKS first on the direct prompt; one named Linode Kubernetes Engine. Amazon EKS was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Linode Kubernetes Engine by eleven and Amazon EKS carries 71 labels and Linode Kubernetes Engine 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the managed kubernetes platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Amazon EKS and Linode Kubernetes Engine were named in the same answer fifty-seven times, of the 214 answers naming Amazon EKS and the 65 naming Linode Kubernetes Engine. In those answers Linode Kubernetes Engine took the first choice six times and Amazon EKS two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid EKS / AKS / GKE if you need low operational overhead on a tight budget or want maximum portability.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Big 3 (GKE/AKS/EKS) due to control plane fees” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“"the worst managed Kubernetes provider out of all the major players."” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“AWS EKS or Google GKE are often the safest bets due to their maturity, extensive ecosystems, and reliability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most teams, the shortlist is Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS).” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Go with Amazon EKS (with Karpenter) if you are already on AWS and want the largest ecosystem of tools and talent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Multiple negative labels indicate reliability issues; not recommended for core mission-critical production workloads” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“88% negative label rate. "Avoid these for core mission-critical production workloads."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“May be economical but often lack enterprise-grade features, HA guarantees, or mature tooling ecosystems” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for developers, startups, and mid-market teams that need affordable managed Kubernetes with transparent pricing.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Absolute cheapest to start: DigitalOcean Kubernetes or Linode LKE” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommended for startups and small businesses due to its affordability and ease of use.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.