AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Wing · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Wing

15Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in SSPM for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 95 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations8%4 of 950%7under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labels2
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wing and Grip are frequently highlighted as the top value and discovery picks for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · SSPM · direct prompt · first choice
“Wing Security or Obsidian often provide the best balance of capability, usability, and price” Kimi K2 · SSPM · scale prompt · first choice
“the best SSPM choice is usually Wing or Grip” Perplexity Sonar · SSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Wing or Suridata for value-led posture” Llama 4 Maverick · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wing, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wing was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AppOmni11 of 154Not among the top eight
Nudge Security11 of 152Not among the top eight
Grip Security10 of 151Not among the top eight
Obsidian8 of 151Not among the top eight
Adaptive Shield5 of 151Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike3 of 150Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield3 of 150Not among the top eight
Valence Security3 of 150Not among the top eight
Zscaler SSPM3 of 150Not among the top eight
BetterCloud2 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Wing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com12
cyberpress.org9
startupstash.com8
guideflow.com7
reco.ai7
work-management.org7
cybersecuritynews.com6
itechguides.com6
spotsaas.com6
us.fitgap.com6

No domain is on file for Wing, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Wing stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
673,000 a month (“wing”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
654,204 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 95 in SSPM
Segment leader
30%
Wing Security
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Wing

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Wing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wing, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.