IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › White Knight Labs · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

White Knight Labs

1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. White Knight Labs was named 1 time in PTaaS, where Cobalt led with 44%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market57 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ptaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named White Knight Labs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Penetration testing as a serviceSecurity operations0%57 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for White Knight Labs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated White Knight Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Advanced and specialized testing” Mistral Small · PTaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as White Knight Labs, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and White Knight Labs was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Astra Security1 of 11Not in the top three
Bishop Fox1 of 10Not in the top three
BreachLock1 of 10Not in the top three
Cobalt1 of 10Not in the top three
DeepStrike1 of 10Not in the top three
Intruder1 of 10Not in the top three
Invicti1 of 10Not in the top three
NetSPI1 of 10Not in the top three
Rapid71 of 10Not in the top three
Synack1 of 10Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named White Knight Labs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named White Knight Labs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clutch.co1
cybersecurityventures.com1
deepstrike.io1
techrepublic.com1

Four of the four domain citations in answers naming White Knight Labs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clutch.co/it-services/cybersecurity/penetration-testing1
cybersecurityventures.com/10-hot-penetration-testing-companies-to-watch-in-20241
deepstrike.io/blog/top-penetration-testing-companies-us1
techrepublic.com/article/best-penetration-testing-companies1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when White Knight Labs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as White Knight Labs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at whiteknightlabs.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack