| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server virtualization platforms | Cloud and infrastructure | 10% | 4 of 78 | 52% | 58 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Industry leader in enterprise virtualization... For enterprises: VMware ESXi and Microsoft Hyper-V are the most feature-rich and widely supported.” Mistral Small · Server virtualization · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Market Leader: VMware (vSphere / ESXi) ... Choose VMware if money is no object and you need the absolute most robust, feature-rich toolset” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Server virtualization · comparative prompt · first choice
“Despite recent licensing controversies, VMware remains the industry benchmark for virtualization performance, security, and high availability.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Server virtualization · comparative prompt · first choice
“is highly recommended for small businesses... This makes VMware ESXi a strong choice for companies with 1 to 3 servers and limited budgets” Mistral Small · Server virtualization · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid unless necessary: VMware vSphere — the cost increases post-Broadcom acquisition make it difficult to justify for mid-market budgets” Kimi K2 · Server virtualization · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for new or ongoing production deployments unless you have a specific support arrangement.” GPT-6 Luna · Server virtualization · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why NOT VMware for Limited Budgets? ... prohibitively expensive” Kimi K2 · Server virtualization · budget prompt · hard negative
“Why VMware is no longer a limited-budget choice” Muse Glimmer 30B · Server virtualization · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 144 of the 166 answers that named VMware vSphere and are not a share of its labels.
397 of the 397 domain citations in answers naming VMware vSphere came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VMware vSphere's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VMware vSphere, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for VMware vSphere by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: