AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Red Hat Virtualization · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Red Hat Virtualization

28Judge labels
1First choices
8Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Server virtualization for enterprise buyers
Rank 51 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In server virtualization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Red Hat Virtualization for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Server virtualization platformsCloud and infrastructure0%51 of 7833%9under 10 labels · led by Proxmox VE at 42%
Virtual desktopsIT operations and endpoint0%21 of 810%3under 10 labels · led by Azure Virtual Desktop at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Red Hat Virtualization yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Red Hat Virtualization across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02024
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Enterprises standardized on Red Hat/Linux and looking for a supported enterprise virtualization platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Server virtualization · comparative prompt · alternative
“open‑source solutions such as abcdesktop.io, Apache Guacamole, or Red Hat Virtualization are viable alternatives” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Virtual desktops · budget prompt · alternative
“Linux/Red Hat standardization: KVM/Red Hat virtualization stack” GPT-5.4 mini · Server virtualization · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best RHEL/CentOS Shops” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Server virtualization · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you build your infrastructure today on RHV, you are building on land that will eventually be condemned.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Server virtualization · negative prompt · hard negative
“Red Hat Virtualization – Deprecated ... Avoid for new projects” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Server virtualization · negative prompt · hard negative
“Red Hat has deprecated Red Hat Virtualization in favor of Red Hat OpenShift” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Server virtualization · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Red Hat Virtualization, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Red Hat Virtualization was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Proxmox VE21 of 281Not among the top eight
VMware vSphere20 of 2810Not among the top eight
Microsoft Hyper-V20 of 283Not among the top eight
Nutanix AHV15 of 284Not among the top eight
KVM10 of 280Not among the top eight
Citrix Hypervisor8 of 280Not among the top eight
oVirt5 of 280Not among the top eight
Amazon WorkSpaces4 of 280Not among the top eight
Oracle VM VirtualBox4 of 280Not among the top eight
Citrix DaaS3 of 281Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Red Hat Virtualization. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 28 answers that named Red Hat Virtualization and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

techdogs.com9
gitnux.org8
g2.com7
guideflow.com7
techbullion.com7
thectoclub.com7
linkedin.com6
v2cloud.com6
virtualizationhowto.com6
devopsschool.com5

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Red Hat Virtualization came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

redhat.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Red Hat Virtualization takes 0% of first choices and Proxmox VE takes 42%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “server virtualization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “server virtualization platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“red hat virtualization”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
39 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,347,338 a month
Searches its site ranks for
147,391 · 16,512 in the top three
Sites linking to it
105,781
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $281 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
117+ ads · 117 text · 117 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as Red Hat, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 61 in the year, 56 before. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 78 in server virtualization
Segment leader
42%
Proxmox VE
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
28 answers
Its own site cited
in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on redhat.com
13,605
subdomains included
Content
3,373
counted in the table below
Documentation
9
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,93412026-07-08API management, Object storage
Blog1,265102026-09-25API management, Object storage
Conference or event11302021-06-07
Webinar or virtual event2902020-09-28
Case study1302021-06-30
Comparison802018-05-21
Report or ebook602021-05-20
Podcast or video402025-06-05
Glossary or explainer1undated

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on redhat.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page redhat.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name API management (11); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Red Hat Virtualization

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Red Hat Virtualization; a claim can dispute any of them.
Red Hat Virtualization (KVM-based) 1Red Hat Virtualization (RHV / oVirt) 1Red Hat Virtualization (RHV) 1Red Hat virtualization / KVM-based stacks 1

Follow Red Hat Virtualization

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Red Hat Virtualization is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
U.S. Department Of DefenseU.S. NavyBrightly SoftwarePorsche Informatik
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Red Hat Virtualization's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: redhat.com, redhat.com/zh-cn/trust, redhat.com/en/solutions/public-sector/dod-devsecops, redhat.com/zh-cn/customers, redhat.com/zh-cn/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Red Hat Virtualization's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Red Hat Virtualization, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Red Hat Virtualization by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Red Hat Virtualization is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Red Hat Virtualization, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at redhat.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.