AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SentinelOne Singularity Deception · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

SentinelOne Singularity Deception

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SentinelOne Singularity Deception was named 1 time in Deception, where Thinkst Canary led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In deception · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SentinelOne Singularity Deception for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Deception technologySecurity operations0%51 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by Thinkst Canary at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SentinelOne Singularity Deception yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity Deception across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Platform-Integrated Deception (e.g., SentinelOne Singularity Deception, Fortinet FortiDeceptor) ... Best For: Companies already heavily invested in these specific security ecosystems.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Deception · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity Deception, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity Deception was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Thinkst Canary3 of 33Not among the top eight
Acalvio ShadowPlex3 of 30Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiDeceptor2 of 30Not among the top eight
Tracebit1 of 31Not among the top eight
Commvault ThreatWise1 of 30Not among the top eight
Fidelis Deception1 of 30Not among the top eight
Illusive1 of 30Not among the top eight
OpenCanary1 of 30Not among the top eight
Tenable1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Deception. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Deception and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

acalvio.com3
canary.tools2
cybersectools.com2
sentinelone.comYour site2
aimultiple.com1
blog.thinkst.com1
coalitioninc.com1
crowdstrike.com1
devopsschool.com1
fidelissecurity.com1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Singularity Deception came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sentinelone.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SentinelOne Singularity Deception takes 0% of first choices and Thinkst Canary takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “deception technology platform”
5
Position for “deception technology platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 446,702 a month
Searches its site ranks for
36,548 · 3,580 in the top three
Sites linking to it
19,511
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $780 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
38 ads · 34 text, 2 image, 2 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as SENTINELONE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 15 in the year, 23 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 94 in deception
Segment leader
37%
Thinkst Canary
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sentinelone.com
10,071
subdomains included
Content
2,891
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
71 · 13
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,583undatedXDR, EDR
News or press44082026-09-24Endpoint protection, XDR
Webinar or virtual event224undatedXDR, SIEM
Report or ebook224undatedXDR, Endpoint protection
Glossary or explainer189undatedCSPM, CNAPP
Comparison132undatedSIEM, EDR
Case study38undatedEDR
Template or tool24undatedSIEM
Conference or event2002026-04-20XDR
Podcast or video17undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sentinelone.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name XDR (82); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SentinelOne Singularity Deception

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SentinelOne Singularity Deception is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
This video explains the Deception Objects feature in Singularity Identity, which are essential for creating protection policies.
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What SentinelOne Singularity Deception's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: university.sentinelone.com/courses/deception-objects. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Singularity Deception's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Singularity Deception, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne Singularity Deception by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SentinelOne Singularity Deception is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne Singularity Deception, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sentinelone.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.