Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 15 of 44
1 category · RankedSemgrep Supply Chain
24Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in SCA for small business buyers
Rank 22 of 50 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 49
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market22 of 50
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 56
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In sca · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Semgrep Supply Chain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 0% | 22 of 50 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Semgrep Supply Chain held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SCA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 24 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 18 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 22 of 50 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Semgrep Supply Chain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Semgrep Supply Chain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Snyk or Semgrep for developer-first CI/CD workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · SCA · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Newer/budget-friendly, but lighter on enterprise features” Grok 4.20 · SCA · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Semgrep Supply Chain, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Semgrep Supply Chain was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Semgrep Supply Chain, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Semgrep Supply Chain was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Semgrep Supply Chain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Semgrep Supply Chain and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com18
dupple.com16
checkmarx.com14
endorlabs.com14
expertinsights.com13
sonatype.com13
mend.io12
g2.com11
itechguides.com11
appsecsanta.com10
132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Semgrep Supply Chain came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
semgrep.dev is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Semgrep Supply Chain takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
semgrep.dev is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Semgrep Supply Chain takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “software composition analysis tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “software composition analysis tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“semgrep supply chain”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,461 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 476 · 63 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,217
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 50 in SCA
Segment leader
31%
Trivy
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on semgrep.dev
1,549
subdomains included
Content
764
counted in the table below
Documentation
617
Product · Integration
81 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 369 | undated | SAST, SCA | ||
| Blog | 316 | undated | SAST, SCA | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 37 | undated | |||
| Case study | 19 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | undated | SAST | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 8, 2026SecTor 2026Toronto, Canada · exhibited
- October 7, 2026SecTor 2026Toronto, Canada · exhibited
- October 6, 2026SecTor 2026Toronto, Canada · exhibited
- August 27, 2026Realms of Cyber 2026Brisbane, Australia
As the event pages on semgrep.dev state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page semgrep.dev exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SAST (17); 7 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Semgrep Supply Chain
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Semgrep Supply Chain is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Semgrep Supply Chain is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Fix vulnerabilities in open source dependencies and block malware
- For
- AppSec and Dev teams
- Price stated
- $0/month/contributor; $30/month/contributor; Custom semgrep.dev/pricing
- Starting price
- 30 semgrep.dev/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Edition semgrep.dev/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC 2
- Customers named
- CriblHomebaseSola SecurityICE ServicesCopperFareportalTideVanta
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Semgrep Supply Chain's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: semgrep.dev, semgrep.dev/pricing, trust.semgrep.dev, semgrep.dev/products/pro-engine, semgrep.dev/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Semgrep Supply Chain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Semgrep Supply Chain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Semgrep Supply Chain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Semgrep Supply Chain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Semgrep Supply Chain, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.