Every category where a model named Semgrep Supply Chain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Software composition analysis	Developer platform	0%	20 of 49	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Semgrep Supply Chain yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Semgrep Supply Chain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative16 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Semgrep Supply Chain is also a strong budget option because its free edition covers up to 10 contributors” Perplexity Sonar · SCA · budget prompt · alternative

“adding Semgrep Supply Chain is a natural and highly efficient choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SCA · direct prompt · alternative

“Lightweight, best for smaller teams needing basic reachability analysis.” Mistral Small · SCA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Lightweight SCA with basic reachability | Smaller teams/starting out” MiniMax M2.5 · SCA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Semgrep Supply Chain, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Semgrep Supply Chain was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snyk Open Source26 of 2813Not in the top three

Trivy18 of 287Not in the top three

Black Duck16 of 281Not in the top three

Mend.io16 of 280Not in the top three

FOSSA14 of 280Not in the top three

Endor Labs12 of 282Not in the top three

Sonatype Lifecycle11 of 281Not in the top three

Socket11 of 280Not in the top three

OWASP Dependency-Check10 of 280Not in the top three

Checkmarx SCA8 of 280Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Semgrep Supply Chain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 28 answers that named Semgrep Supply Chain and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

endorlabs.com25

dupple.com16

blog.jetbrains.com13

expertinsights.com13

toolradar.com12

appsecsanta.com11

guideflow.com11

cycode.com9

kiuwan.com9

mend.io9

128 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming Semgrep Supply Chain came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

endorlabs.com/learn/best-sca-tools-05b7a24

endorlabs.com/learn/best-sca-tools17

dupple.com/learn/best-software-composition-analysis-tools16

blog.jetbrains.com/qodana/2025/09/best-software-composition-analysis-tools13

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-software-composition-analysis-tools13

guideflow.com/blog/software-composition-analysis-tools11

toolradar.com/blog/best-software-composition-analysis-tools11

cycode.com/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Semgrep Supply Chain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Semgrep Supply Chain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at semgrep.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.