Every category where a model named Endor Labs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Software composition analysis	Developer platform	0%	11 of 49	0%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Endor Labs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Endor Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative22 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative12 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Endor Labs: Focuses on full-stack reachability and reduces noise by 95% using call graph analysis. Ideal for teams wanting deep, accurate dependency scanning.” Mistral Small · SCA · comparative prompt · first choice

“Full-stack reachability analysis with 95% noise reduction via call graph analysis | Large enterprises prioritizing precision” MiniMax M2.5 · SCA · comparative prompt · first choice

“Endor Labs – Full‑stack reachability, ~95% noise reduction (per their own testing).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SCA · negative prompt · first choice

“Prioritize tools with deep reachability analysis like Endor Labs or Semgrep” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SCA · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Endor Labs, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Endor Labs was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snyk Open Source50 of 5414Not in the top three

Black Duck47 of 5410Not in the top three

Mend.io43 of 542Not in the top three

Sonatype Lifecycle39 of 545Not in the top three

FOSSA21 of 540Not in the top three

OWASP Dependency-Check19 of 540Not in the top three

Checkmarx SCA17 of 540Not in the top three

JFrog Xray17 of 540Not in the top three

Trivy16 of 544Not in the top three

Semgrep Supply Chain12 of 541Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Endor Labs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 54 answers that named Endor Labs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

endorlabs.comYour site48

cycode.com28

safeguard.sh25

guideflow.com24

ox.security23

expertinsights.com22

appsecsanta.com20

dupple.com19

aikido.dev18

mend.io18

197 of the 245 domain citations in answers naming Endor Labs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

endorlabs.com/learn/best-sca-tools-05b7a43

endorlabs.com/learn/best-sca-tools32

ox.security/blog/software-composition-analysis-and-sca-tools23

guideflow.com/blog/software-composition-analysis-tools22

cycode.com/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools21

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-software-composition-analysis-tools21

dupple.com/learn/best-software-composition-analysis-tools19

toolradar.com/blog/best-software-composition-analysis-tools18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Endor Labs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Endor Labs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at endorlabs.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.