Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 35 of 44
3 categories · RankedEndor Labs
33Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in SCA for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 50 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Endor Labs →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business37 of 49
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 50
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 56
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In sca · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Endor Labs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 0% | 16 of 50 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 0% | 30 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 47 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Endor Labs held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SCA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 14 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 13 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 16 of 50 |
| SAST | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 71, unchanged |
| ASPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 70, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Endor Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Endor Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative13 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative9 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Low-Noise Leaders: Endor Labs (reachability focus)” Grok 4.20 · SCA · negative prompt · first choice
“Endor Labs — strong reachability analysis” Kimi K2 · SCA · negative prompt · first choice
“more frequently recommended in 2025–2026 for their reachability analysis and lower false-positive rates” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SCA · negative prompt · alternative
“Endor Labs offers full-stack reachability with 95% noise reduction through call graph analysis” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SCA · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Endor Labs, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Endor Labs was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Endor Labs, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Endor Labs was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Endor Labs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named Endor Labs and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
endorlabs.comYour site26
guideflow.com22
sonatype.com19
mend.io17
checkmarx.com16
dupple.com16
appsecsanta.com15
ox.security14
safeguard.sh14
expertinsights.com13
146 of the 172 domain citations in answers naming Endor Labs came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
endorlabs.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Endor Labs takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
endorlabs.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Endor Labs takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “software composition analysis tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “software composition analysis tools”
1
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“endor labs”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,338 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,034 · 84 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,328
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 50 in SCA
Segment leader
31%
Trivy
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on endorlabs.com
10,456
subdomains included
Content
865
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
51 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 479 | 120 | 2026-09-28 | SCA, SAST | |
| Conference or event | 184 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 153 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 27 | 7 | 2026-09-16 | SCA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | undated | SCA, AI coding | ||
| Blog | 9 | undated | SAST | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Project mount symlink traversal in brig how a sandbox reaches host directories it was never given glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Best code security tools glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Engineering a security harness for ai coding agents glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Opus 5 5 6x cheaper and 2x faster than fable 5 1 but memorization keeps it off the top spot glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-21Llm development risks security threats and mitigation strategies glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-21Vulnerability blast radius how to measure and reduce impact glossary or explainer
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 24, 2026Speed and Security F1 Arcade Night Boston with Endor Labs and Cursorplace not stated · hosted
- June 25, 2026 to June 26, 2026OWASP Global AppSec Europeplace not stated · exhibited
- January 22, 2026Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Meetupplace not stated · hosted
As the event pages on endorlabs.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page endorlabs.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Endor Labs
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Endor Labs is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Endor Labs is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic Application Security Platform
- For
- security teams
- Price stated
- Pricing is seat-based and varies slightly depending on the SKU. endorlabs.com/pricing
- Starting price
- FREE endorlabs.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get Started Free endorlabs.com
- Integrations claimed
- 29 endorlabs.com/customers
- Certifications
- FedRAMPISO 42001PCI DSSSOC 2
- Customers named
- RubrikEgnyteAstronomerAtlassianGleanCursorDropboxNetskope
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Endor Labs's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: endorlabs.com, endorlabs.com/pricing, trust.endorlabs.com, endorlabs.com/platform, endorlabs.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Endor Labs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Endor Labs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Endor Labs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Endor Labs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Endor Labs, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.