Index › Products › Security Copilot · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Security Copilot

15Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Security Copilot was named 5 times in AI security and 1 other category, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market30 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Security Copilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	2%	30 of 233	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
AI SOC agents	Security operations	0%	31 of 104	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Security Copilot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Security Copilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall Integration: Microsoft Purview + Security Copilot” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI security · direct prompt · first choice

“Microsoft Sentinel (SIEM) + Security Copilot — leverages existing licensing” Kimi K2 · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative

“Agentic AI via Security Copilot agents – $4.30/GB ingested (pay-as-you-go)” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative

“If Microsoft-heavy: Microsoft Security Copilot ($4/SCU-hour)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Security Copilot, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Security Copilot was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel11 of 150Not among the top eight

Dropzone AI8 of 152Not among the top eight

Huntress Managed EDR8 of 151Not among the top eight

UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC5 of 153Not among the top eight

Wazuh5 of 151Not among the top eight

Intezer AI SOC5 of 150Not among the top eight

Elastic Security4 of 150Not among the top eight

Prophet Security4 of 150Not among the top eight

AiSOC3 of 151Not among the top eight

UnderDefense3 of 151Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Security Copilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Security Copilot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

underdefense.com13

panther.com7

resources.rework.com7

us.fitgap.com7

checkthat.ai6

securityboulevard.com6

d3security.com5

dropzone.ai5

github.com5

intezer.com5

No domain is on file for Security Copilot, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

underdefense.com/blog/most-affordable-ai-soc-platforms11

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-smb8

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-agents/best-ai-agents-for-cybersecurity-20266

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-mid-market6

underdefense.com/blog/security-operations-center-tools6

us.fitgap.com/search/ai-soc-agents/small-business6

panther.com/blog/best-ai-soc-platforms5

securityboulevard.com/2026/03/the-best-ai-soc-platforms-2026-comprehensive-comparison-guid5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Security Copilot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Security Copilot; a claim can dispute any of them.

Microsoft Sentinel + Security Copilot 2Microsoft Purview + Security Copilot 1

Follow Security Copilot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Security Copilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Security Copilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Security Copilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Security Copilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Security Copilot, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.