AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Secureworks · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Secureworks

6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Secureworks was named 1 time in PTaaS, where Cobalt led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ptaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Secureworks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Penetration testing as a serviceSecurity operations0%67 of 820%1under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Secureworks held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · PTaaS · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 60 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 18 of 63

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
PTaaS0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 51 → 67 of 82

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Secureworks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Secureworks, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secureworks was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cobalt5 of 61Not among the top eight
NetSPI4 of 63Not among the top eight
Synack4 of 61Not among the top eight
Coalfire4 of 60Not among the top eight
NCC Group4 of 60Not among the top eight
Bishop Fox3 of 61Not among the top eight
Mandiant3 of 61Not among the top eight
HackerOne3 of 60Not among the top eight
Rapid73 of 60Not among the top eight
Astra Security2 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Secureworks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named Secureworks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

beaglesecurity.com3
deepstrike.io3
expertinsights.com3
synack.com3
underdefense.com3
getastra.com2
linkedin.com2
netspi.com2
softwaresecured.com2
stingrai.io2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Secureworks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

secureworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Secureworks takes 0% of first choices and Cobalt takes 45%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “penetration testing service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “penetration testing services”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 3,450 a month
Searches its site ranks for
371 · 27 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,005
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 67 of 82 in ptaas
Segment leader
45%
Cobalt
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on secureworks.com
9,298
subdomains included
Content
2,843
counted in the table below
Documentation
15
Product · Integration
223 · 265
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog2,50862026-09-11MDR, XDR
Report or ebook14602022-07-13MDR, Endpoint protection
Podcast or video9502021-07-05
Webinar or virtual event2902026-01-26MDR
Comparison2502024-12-30MDR, ZTNA
Glossary or explainer1712026-08-18XDR, ZTNA
Case study912026-08-11ITDR
Conference or event602025-07-09
Template or tool4undatedMDR
News or press402023-12-13

Events in person

Last twelve months
  • August 5, 2026Conference Track SessionBallroom I, Las Vegas, United States · spoke
  • August 5, 2026Sophos AfterpartyHyperX Arena, Luxor Hotel, Las Vegas, United States · hosted
  • August 4, 2026 to August 6, 2026Black Hat USA 2026Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas, United States · took part
  • August 4, 2026CISO SummitAt Four Seasons, Las Vegas, United States · spoke

As the event pages on secureworks.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page secureworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name MDR (69); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Secureworks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secureworks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secureworks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secureworks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Secureworks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Secureworks, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at secureworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.