AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SANS Institute – Developer Security Training · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

SANS Institute – Developer Security Training

1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SANS Institute – Developer Security Training was named 1 time in Secure code training, where SecureFlag led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market59 of 97
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In secure code training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SANS Institute – Developer Security Training for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Secure code trainingDeveloper platform0%59 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SANS Institute – Developer Security Training yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SANS Institute – Developer Security Training across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Premium pricing; may be overkill for smaller teams” Kimi K2 · Secure code training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SANS Institute – Developer Security Training, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SANS Institute – Developer Security Training was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SafeStack Academy1 of 11Not among the top eight
Top 10 Dev Training1 of 11Not among the top eight
Secure Code Warrior1 of 10Not among the top eight
Security Journey1 of 10Not among the top eight
Veracode Security Labs1 of 10Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SANS Institute – Developer Security Training. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named SANS Institute – Developer Security Training and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blackduck.com1
cmdnctrlsecurity.com1
gartner.com1
guardey.com1
marketintelo.com1
sans.orgYour site1
slashdot.org1
sourceforge.net1
top10devtraining.com1
veracode.com1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming SANS Institute – Developer Security Training came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blackduck.com/developer-security-training.html1
cmdnctrlsecurity.com/training/individual-journeys1
gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools1
guardey.com/security-awareness-training-developers1
marketintelo.com/report/secure-coding-training-market1
sans.org/for-organizations/workforce/risk-management/developer1
sans.org/for-organizations/workforce/risk-management/developer/hands-on1
slashdot.org/software/secure-code-training/f-mid-size-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sans.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SANS Institute – Developer Security Training takes 0% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “secure code training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “secure code training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 703,543 a month
Searches its site ranks for
20,088 · 1,637 in the top three
Sites linking to it
28,475
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
119+ ads · 94 text, 18 image, 7 video · 81 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as THE ESCAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 37 in the year, 82 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 59 of 97 in secure code training
Segment leader
26%
SecureFlag
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
1 answers
Its own site cited
in 1 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sans.org
88
subdomains included
Content
70
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog50312026-09-29
News or press11undated
Conference or event642027-01-15
Report or ebook2undated
Podcast or video1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sans.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SANS Institute – Developer Security Training

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SANS Institute – Developer Security Training's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SANS Institute – Developer Security Training, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SANS Institute – Developer Security Training by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SANS Institute – Developer Security Training is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SANS Institute – Developer Security Training, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sans.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.