IT AI Index

Index › Products › Repsy · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Repsy

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Repsy was named 1 time in Artifact registries, where JFrog Artifactory led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business53 of 86

under the label threshold

Mid-market52 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In artifact registries · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Repsy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Artifact and container registries	Developer platform	0%	52 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by JFrog Artifactory at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Repsy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Repsy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Maven/Java projects only | Repsy (20 GB free)” MiniMax M2.5 · Artifact registries · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Repsy, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Repsy was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Packages2 of 20Not among the top eight

Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition1 of 21Not among the top eight

Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS / Community Edition1 of 21Not among the top eight

Artifact Depot1 of 20Not among the top eight

Azure Artifacts1 of 20Not among the top eight

Cloudsmith1 of 20Not among the top eight

Dist1 of 20Not among the top eight

Google Artifact Registry1 of 20Not among the top eight

JFrog Artifactory OSS1 of 20Not among the top eight

Nexspence — Universal Artifact Repository Manager1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Repsy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Repsy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.repsy.ioYour site2

cloudrepo.io2

itechguides.com2

sonatype.com2

cloudification.io1

craftifact.com1

geekflare.com1

harness.io1

help.sonatype.com1

hokstadconsulting.com1

Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Repsy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.repsy.io/posts/creating-a-free-private-maven-artifact-repository-in-seconds2

cloudrepo.io/articles/best-artifactory-alternatives2

itechguides.com/best/artifact-repository-software2

sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository2

cloudification.io/cloud-blog/sonatype-nexus-repository-the-foundation-of-a-secure-software1

craftifact.com/pricing1

geekflare.com/dev/best-repository-management-software1

harness.io/blog/best-artifact-repository-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on repsy.io

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	10	undated	Artifact registries
Comparison	1	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page repsy.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Repsy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Repsy is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: repsy provides secure, scalable hosting for your packages.
repsy.io
For: Developers
repsy.io
Free plan or trial: Start with 20 GB free storage repsy.io
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Repsy's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: repsy.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Repsy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Repsy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Repsy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Repsy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Repsy, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.