AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Qualys External Attack Surface Management · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Qualys External Attack Surface Management

8Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Qualys External Attack Surface Management was named 1 time in ASM, where Intruder led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Qualys External Attack Surface Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%54 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Qualys External Attack Surface Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · ASM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 85 → 79 of 93
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 50 → 54 of 98
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 23 of 81

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ASM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 50 → 54 of 100

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Qualys External Attack Surface Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Part of broader Qualys Cloud Platform; strong CVE coverage” Kimi K2 · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qualys External Attack Surface Management, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qualys External Attack Surface Management was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CyCognito5 of 82Not among the top eight
Tenable Attack Surface Management5 of 80Not among the top eight
Bitsight4 of 80Not among the top eight
Intruder3 of 83Not among the top eight
Cortex Xpanse3 of 82Not among the top eight
Halo Security3 of 81Not among the top eight
IONIX3 of 81Not among the top eight
Censys ASM3 of 80Not among the top eight
Detectify3 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qualys External Attack Surface Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Qualys External Attack Surface Management and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

qualys.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Qualys External Attack Surface Management takes 0% of first choices and Intruder takes 49%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “attack surface management platform”
9
Position for “attack surface management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 26,929 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,871 · 526 in the top three
Sites linking to it
15,233
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 108 text, 9 video, 3 image · 46 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Qualys Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 49 in the year, 71 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 54 of 100 in ASM
Segment leader
49%
Intruder
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
8 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on qualys.com
11,443
subdomains included
Content
1,744
counted in the table below
Documentation
8,191
Product · Integration
314 · 73
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,171412026-09-28Patching, ASM
Report or ebook40302024-01-01CNAPP
Glossary or explainer6202025-12-30Patching, CNAPP
Conference or event5702023-11-01
Template or tool1602017-04-01
Webinar or virtual event1202023-07-01
Case study1102017-11-01
Comparison812026-09-10PAM, IGA
News or press4undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on qualys.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page qualys.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name patching (12); 8 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Qualys External Attack Surface Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qualys External Attack Surface Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
Qualys EASM 1

Follow Qualys External Attack Surface Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Qualys External Attack Surface Management is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
proof-of-value for EASM scanning
For
Enterprise Customer
Free plan or trial
free report qualys.com/easm-report-partner
Customers named
Brown & Brown InsuranceIDB Bank
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Qualys External Attack Surface Management's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: qualys.com/easm-report-partner, qualys.com/solutions/attack-surface-management, qualys.com/apps/external-attack-surface-management, docs.qualys.com/en/etm/latest/integration_qualys_apps/etm_easm.htm, blog.qualys.com/product-tech/2023/03/16/a-new-approach-to-discover-monitor-and-reduce-your-modern-web-attack-surface. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qualys External Attack Surface Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qualys External Attack Surface Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qualys External Attack Surface Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Qualys External Attack Surface Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qualys External Attack Surface Management, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qualys.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.