| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data masking and test data management | Data platform | 0% | 22 of 140 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“shortlist Delphix for virtualized test-data delivery” GPT-6 Luna · Data masking · comparative prompt · first choice
“Perforce Delphix if your team is DevOps-heavy and needs rapid virtual database provisioning” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Data masking · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“look at Perforce Delphix... may be more platform than a mid-market team needs” GPT-6 Luna · Data masking · direct prompt · alternative
“Perforce Delphix is the alternative leaders mention” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data masking · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“It may be overkill and expensive for most mid-sized B2B companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data masking · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Perforce Delphix and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-four of the 102 domain citations in answers naming Perforce Delphix came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Perforce Delphix's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: perforce.com/products/delphix, perforce.com/customers/delphix, perforce.com/solutions/data-protection, perforce.com/solutions/data-compliance, perforce.com/solutions/test-data-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Perforce Delphix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Perforce Delphix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Perforce Delphix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: