IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › Octopus Deploy · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Octopus Deploy

13Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CI/CD for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 45 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market18 of 45
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 41
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Octopus Deploy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CI/CD platformsDeveloper platform0%18 of 450%2under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Octopus Deploy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Octopus Deploy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Enterprises scaling to dozens or hundreds of microservices who need rigorous, governed release pipelines.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CI/CD · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Octopus Deploy, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Octopus Deploy was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GitLab CI/CD12 of 136Not in the top three
GitHub Actions10 of 133Not in the top three
Jenkins10 of 130Not in the top three
Harness9 of 130Not in the top three
CircleCI8 of 130Not in the top three
Azure DevOps6 of 131Not in the top three
JetBrains TeamCity6 of 130Not in the top three
Buildkite3 of 130Not in the top three
Atlassian Bamboo2 of 130Not in the top three
Azure Pipelines2 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Octopus Deploy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named Octopus Deploy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

octopus.comYour site12
toolradar.com9
blog.jetbrains.com7
em360tech.com7
kuberns.com5
northflank.com5
atlassian.com4
checkthat.ai4
devopsness.com4
harness.io4

Forty-nine of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Octopus Deploy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

octopus.com/devops/ci-cd/ci-cd-tools-for-enterprise12
toolradar.com/blog/best-ci-cd-tools9
blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2026/03/best-ci-tools7
em360tech.com/top-10/top-enterprise-ci-cd-tools7
kuberns.com/blogs/best-cicd-tools5
northflank.com/blog/best-ci-cd-tools5
devopsness.com/blog/best-cicd-platforms4
harness.io/blog/continuous-delivery-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Octopus Deploy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Octopus Deploy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at octopus.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack