AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › NetSPI BAS · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

NetSPI BAS

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NetSPI BAS was named 1 time in BAS, where Cymulate led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market56 of 74
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 66
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In bas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NetSPI BAS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Breach and attack simulationSecurity operations0%56 of 740%1under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NetSPI BAS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NetSPI BAS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NetSPI BAS, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetSPI BAS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AttackIQ2 of 21Not among the top eight
Cymulate2 of 20Not among the top eight
Picus Security Validation Platform2 of 20Not among the top eight
SafeBreach2 of 20Not among the top eight
NodeZero1 of 21Not among the top eight
Pentera1 of 21Not among the top eight
Adaptive Security1 of 20Not among the top eight
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation1 of 20Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiTester1 of 20Not among the top eight
FourCore1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NetSPI BAS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named NetSPI BAS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

picussecurity.com2
adaptivesecurity.com1
attackiq.com1
comparitech.com1
csoonline.com1
esecurityplanet.com1
g2.com1
gartner.com1
gbhackers.com1
guideflow.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming NetSPI BAS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

picussecurity.com/platform/breach-and-attack-simulation2
adaptivesecurity.com/blog/top-bas-platforms-to-strengthen-security-in-20251
attackiq.com/products/enterprise1
comparitech.com/net-admin/best-bas-tools1
csoonline.com/article/2132289/breach-and-attack-simulation-tools.html1
esecurityplanet.com/products/breach-and-attack-simulation-bas-vendors1
g2.com/categories/breach-and-attack-simulation-bas1
g2.com/categories/breach-and-attack-simulation-bas/small-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

netspi.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, NetSPI BAS takes 0% of first choices and Cymulate takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “breach and attack simulation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “breach and attack simulation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 4,142 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,521 · 61 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,061
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $336 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 69 image, 51 text · 43 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as NetSPI, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 78 in the year, 42 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 74 in BAS
Segment leader
24%
Cymulate
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on netspi.com
1,849
subdomains included
Content
1,553
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog781132026-09-22ASM, PTaaS
News or press41722026-09-02ASM, PTaaS
Webinar or virtual event13322026-08-26ASM, EDR
Podcast or video8902026-06-24
Conference or event41undated
Case study3702026-01-05ASM
Report or ebook2002026-05-14PTaaS, ASM
Comparison1802026-03-30ASM
Template or tool1402025-03-25
Glossary or explainer302022-03-16SASE

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page netspi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ASM (31); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow NetSPI BAS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetSPI BAS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetSPI BAS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NetSPI BAS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where NetSPI BAS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name NetSPI BAS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netspi.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.