Index › Products › Neosync · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Neosync

9Judge labels

2First choices

3Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Neosync was named 1 time in Data masking, where DATPROF led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 152

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 140

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In data masking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Neosync for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data masking and test data management	Data platform	2%	17 of 140	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Neosync yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Neosync across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need to sync multiple environments safely and want a modern CI/CD workflow, use Neosync.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data masking · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Neosync, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Neosync was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tonic.ai6 of 93Not among the top eight

Delphix6 of 90Not among the top eight

Greenmask5 of 92Not among the top eight

PostgreSQL Anonymizer5 of 92Not among the top eight

Faker4 of 90Not among the top eight

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud4 of 90Not among the top eight

Snowflake3 of 90Not among the top eight

DATPROF2 of 90Not among the top eight

IBM InfoSphere Optim2 of 90Not among the top eight

K2View Test Data Management2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Neosync. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Neosync and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

github.com7

tonic.ai6

datprof.com5

ovaledge.com5

getautonoma.com4

xata.io4

accutivesecurity.com3

iri.com3

k2view.com3

neon.com3

No domain is on file for Neosync, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

github.com/nucleuscloud/neosync6

datprof.com/solutions/best-data-masking-tools5

ovaledge.com/blog/data-masking-tools5

getautonoma.com/blog/data-masking-tools4

github.com/GreenmaskIO/greenmask4

xata.io/blog/the-5-best-data-anonymization-tools-for-development-teams-in-20264

iri.com/support/data-education-center/the-top-15-data-masking-tools-in-20263

strac.io/blog/best-data-masking-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Neosync

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Neosync's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Neosync, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Neosync by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Neosync is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Neosync, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.