IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › JFrog Pipelines · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

JFrog Pipelines

2Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JFrog Pipelines was named 2 times in CI/CD and 1 other category, where GitHub Actions led with 65%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market40 of 45

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JFrog Pipelines for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CI/CD platforms	Developer platform	0%	40 of 45	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	78 of 86	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JFrog Pipelines yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JFrog Pipelines across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reached end of life May 1, 2026. No features, patches, or security fixes.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Orchestration · negative prompt · hard negative

“JFrog Pipelines — AVOID” Kimi K2 · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JFrog Pipelines, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JFrog Pipelines was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Actions1 of 21Not in the top three

AWS Step Functions1 of 20Not in the top three

Apache Airflow1 of 20Not in the top three

Apache Oozie1 of 20Not in the top three

Atlassian Bamboo1 of 20Not in the top three

Azure Pipelines1 of 20Not in the top three

Buildkite1 of 20Not in the top three

CircleCI1 of 20Not in the top three

Databricks Lakeflow Jobs1 of 20Not in the top three

Flowise / OpenAI Agent Builder1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JFrog Pipelines. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named JFrog Pipelines and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docs.jfrog.comYour site2

apisecurity.io1

aquasec.com1

attic.apache.org1

bipi.in1

blog.gitguardian.com1

blog.jetbrains.com1

cicd.deployment.to1

cicdcalculator.com1

circleci.com1

Nine of the eleven domain citations in answers naming JFrog Pipelines came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/pipeline-deprecation-end-of-life2

apisecurity.io/issue-152-exposed-api-keys-tokens-sast-dast-api-security-testing-value-api-1

aquasec.com/blog/travis-ci-security1

attic.apache.org/projects/oozie.html1

bipi.in/blog/circleci-breach-2023-lessons1

blog.gitguardian.com/ci-cd-security-risks1

blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2026/06/bamboo-end-of-life1

cicd.deployment.to/1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JFrog Pipelines's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JFrog Pipelines, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jfrog.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.