AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Iron Mountain · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Iron Mountain

3Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Iron Mountain was named 1 time in Comms archiving, where Smarsh Enterprise Archive led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In comms archiving · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Iron Mountain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Communications archiving and complianceSecurity operations0%97 of 101100%1under 10 labels · led by Smarsh Enterprise Archive at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Iron Mountain yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Iron Mountain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“cutting off access to over 50 terabytes of archival materials. Iron Mountain refused to return the data” Kimi K2 · Comms archiving · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Iron Mountain, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Iron Mountain was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ABBYY Vantage1 of 31Not among the top eight
Hyperscience Hypercell1 of 31Not among the top eight
Aesto, LLC1 of 30Not among the top eight
Appian1 of 30Not among the top eight
Automation Anywhere1 of 30Not among the top eight
Barracuda Email Protection1 of 30Not among the top eight
Cohesive1 of 30Not among the top eight
Commvault1 of 30Not among the top eight
Coupa1 of 30Not among the top eight
Datadog1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Iron Mountain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Iron Mountain and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

ironmountain.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Iron Mountain takes 0% of first choices and Smarsh Enterprise Archive takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “communications archiving platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “communications archiving platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 139,332 a month
Searches its site ranks for
10,635 · 1,268 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,070
Paid Google search
7 searches its ads show for, about 65 clicks and $758 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 120 text · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as Ledger Bennett Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 17 in the year, 103 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 97 of 101 in comms archiving
Segment leader
20%
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ironmountain.com
934
subdomains included
Content
4
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Conference or event2undated
Glossary or explainer2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ironmountain.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Iron Mountain

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Iron Mountain is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Digitization, Data Center, Records Storage & ITAD Company
Customers named
Canal+AkamaiITVThe GRAMMY Museum®
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Iron Mountain's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ironmountain.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Iron Mountain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Iron Mountain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Iron Mountain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Iron Mountain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Iron Mountain, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ironmountain.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.