Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 11 of 43
2 categories · Named, not rankedGcore
15Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gcore was named 5 times in CDN and 1 other category, where Cloudflare led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 44
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 49
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 45
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In cdn · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gcore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content delivery networks | Network and edge | 0% | 15 of 49 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 68% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Managed DNS | Network and edge | 0% | 69 of 78 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare DNS at 84% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gcore held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CDN · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 15 of 44
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 31 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 15 of 49 |
| Managed DNS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 78, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gcore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gcore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Gcore positions itself as a value option in the CDN market” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CDN · direct prompt · alternative
“Bunny.net/Gcore (cost-conscious with growing feature sets)” Kimi K2 · CDN · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Recent user reports indicate serious operational issues, including frequent outages, slow performance, and inadequate customer support.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Managed DNS · negative prompt · hard negative
“Gcore lacks the advanced customization and analytics tools offered by more premium providers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gcore, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gcore was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gcore, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gcore was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gcore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Gcore and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.blazingcdn.com14
broadbandnow.com6
edgenext.com6
g2.com5
fastly.com4
wpforms.com4
33rdsquare.com3
blog.paessler.com3
cdnetworks.com3
ioriver.io3
Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Gcore came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gcore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gcore takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare takes 68%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gcore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gcore takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare takes 68%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cdn”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cdns”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“gcore”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 44 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 23,524 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,760 · 167 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,135
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 49 in CDN
Segment leader
68%
Cloudflare
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gcore.com
3,598
subdomains included
Content
723
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,828
Product · Integration
4 · 8
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 443 | 7 | 2026-09-09 | CDN, DDoS | |
| Glossary or explainer | 105 | 0 | 2026-04-27 | CDN, WAF | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 45 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | CDN | |
| News or press | 39 | undated | |||
| Case study | 24 | undated | CDN, DDoS | ||
| Comparison | 21 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 17 | 0 | 2024-03-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 14 | 0 | 2026-03-09 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2025-06-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09How gcore built global private backbone blog
- 2026-08-03Diagnosing live stream stalls cdn webinar or virtual event
- 2026-07-27Sifted 100 france benelux top 100 blog
- 2026-07-24Gcore connect recap 2026 blog
- 2026-07-22World cup streaming blog
- 2026-07-20Global inference routing blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 29, 2026 to October 1, 2026SBC 2026place not stated · exhibited
- April 6, 2026 to April 9, 2026SIGMA South America 2026Transamerica Expo Center, São Paulo, Brazil · exhibited
- March 2, 2026 to March 5, 2026MWC 2026Stand 6D44, Hall 6, Fira Gran Via, Barcelona, Spain · exhibited
As the event pages on gcore.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gcore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Gcore
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gcore is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Gcore is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cloud, Edge, Security and AI Solutions
- For
- businesses worldwide
- Price stated
- NextGen WAF (WAAP): Free €0/mo, Start €25/mo, Pro €125/mo, Enterprise Custom. L3/4 DDoS Protection: PAYG —, Start €250/mo, Pro €450/mo, Pro+ €950/mo. Enterprise Starting from €1,500 /mo gcore.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 gcore.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free gcore.com
- Certifications
- PCI DSS Level 1GDPRPCI DSSISO/IEC 27001Tier IIITier IV
- Hosting
- EuropeNorth AmericaLATAMAPACEU-hosted210+ locations worldwideAsiathe US
- Customers named
- MicrosoftProSiebenHiggsfieldFawkes GamesdataforestAVEQLeonardo AIFuncom
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Gcore's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gcore.com, gcore.com/pricing, gcore.com/security/waf, gcore.com/cloud/solutions/erp, gcore.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gcore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gcore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gcore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gcore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gcore, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.