IT AI Index

Index › Products › Gatekeeper · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Gatekeeper

7Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gatekeeper was named 2 times in Microsegmentation and 1 other category, where ColorTokens Xshield led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market38 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In microsegmentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gatekeeper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Microsegmentation	Network and edge	0%	38 of 94	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ColorTokens Xshield at 25%
Network monitoring and management	Network and edge	0%	52 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gatekeeper yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gatekeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“OPA/Gatekeeper (open‑source) | No licensing fees; total control; requires skilled team.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Microsegmentation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gatekeeper, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gatekeeper was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Enclave1 of 71Not among the top eight

ManageEngine OpManager1 of 71Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender Antivirus1 of 71Not among the top eight

ProcessUnity1 of 71Not among the top eight

RidgeShield1 of 71Not among the top eight

AVG AntiVirus Free1 of 70Not among the top eight

Ansible1 of 70Not among the top eight

Aruba Central1 of 70Not among the top eight

Auvik1 of 70Not among the top eight

Avast Business Antivirus1 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gatekeeper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Gatekeeper and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

sourceforge.net2

topbusinesssoftware.com2

us.fitgap.com2

vendr.com2

aimultiple.com1

aravo.com1

avast.com1

bindlegal.com1

capterra.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Gatekeeper came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/products/gatekeeper/pricing2

aimultiple.com/microsegmentation-tools1

aravo.com/blog/best-third-party-risk-management-software-enterprise1

avast.com/en-gb/business1

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/vendor-compliance-contract-monitoring1

capterra.com/p/253101/Microsoft-Defender-for-Business1

casrai.org/guides/microsoft-defender-for-business-pricing1

checkthat.ai/brands/vanta/pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

gatekeeperhq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gatekeeper takes 0% of first choices and ColorTokens Xshield takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “microsegmentation solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “microsegmentation solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 40,500 a month (“gatekeeper”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3,731 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 69,315 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,133 · 239 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,069
Paid Google search: 10 searches its ads show for, about 358 clicks and $83,492 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

36 ads · 35 text, 1 video · 20 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as Cinergy Technology Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 38 of 94 in microsegmentation

Segment leader

25%

ColorTokens Xshield

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 7 answers
Its own site cited: in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on gatekeeperhq.com

870

subdomains included

Content

709

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	343	3	2026-08-28	TPRM
Blog	285	0	2026-06-17	TPRM
Podcast or video	36	undated
Case study	21	3	2026-09-21
Report or ebook	9	0	2025-10-28
Conference or event	5	undated
Comparison	4	1	2026-08-24
Webinar or virtual event	3	undated
Template or tool	3	undated

Most recent

2026-09-21Case study how rockefeller philanthropy advisors unified contract lifecycle management with gatekeeper case study
2026-08-28What is contract intelligence and how does it work glossary or explainer
2026-08-24Gatekeeper vs juro comparison
2026-08-17What is gatekeeper chat conversational ai for contract data glossary or explainer
2026-08-17What is an mcp connector and what can ai see in your data glossary or explainer
2026-07-18Case study how chicago cook workforce partnership automated insurance certificate reviews with gatekeeper agents case study

Events in person

Last twelve months

October 27, 2026From 5,000 Scattered Agreements to One Connected Record: How Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Manages Contracts on NetSuite and GatekeeperAcademy 412 · hosted
October 25, 2026SuiteWorldLas Vegas · exhibited
October 25, 2026Extend NetSuite to the full vendor relationship with Gatekeeper, powered by AI AgentsSuiteWorld On-Air · spoke

As the event pages on gatekeeperhq.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page gatekeeperhq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Gatekeeper

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gatekeeper; a claim can dispute any of them.

OPA (Open Policy Agent) + Gatekeeper 1

Follow Gatekeeper

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Gatekeeper is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The only unified platform for contract, vendor risk, and spend management—helping CFOs, legal, and procurement teams cut costs and stay compliant.
gatekeeperhq.com
For: CFOs, legal, and procurement teams
gatekeeperhq.com
Price stated: Get a quote shaped by what you need today. gatekeeperhq.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free Demo gatekeeperhq.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 1700 gatekeeperhq.com/integrations
Certifications: iso-27001iso-9001soc-2-type-2gdprdora
Customers named: BlaBlaCarHakkasan GroupCricutRedwood LogisticsCompSource Mutual InsuranceChicago Cook Workforce PartnershipFunding CircleDAC Beachcroft LLP
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, hosting

What Gatekeeper's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gatekeeperhq.com, gatekeeperhq.com/pricing, trust.gatekeeperhq.com, gatekeeperhq.com/customers, gatekeeperhq.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gatekeeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gatekeeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gatekeeper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Gatekeeper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gatekeeper, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.