IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › env0 · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

env0

20Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in IaC for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 46 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 44
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 46
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 64
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
In iac · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named env0 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Infrastructure as codeCloud and infrastructure0%12 of 460%5under 10 labels · led by Terraform at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for env0 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated env0 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider env0 or Spacelift as the orchestration/governance layer” Perplexity Sonar · IaC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“a third-party framework (like Spacelift, env0, or Scalr)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IaC · direct prompt · alternative
“Using a third-party manager like Spacelift or env0” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IaC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“alternative platforms like Spacelift, env0, or Scalr” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IaC · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as env0, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and env0 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Terraform20 of 2010Not in the top three
Spacelift20 of 201Not in the top three
OpenTofu18 of 2010Not in the top three
Pulumi18 of 205Not in the top three
Scalr12 of 200Not in the top three
Crossplane11 of 201Not in the top three
AWS CDK8 of 200Not in the top three
AWS CloudFormation7 of 200Not in the top three
Ansible6 of 200Not in the top three
Azure Bicep4 of 200Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named env0. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 20 answers that named env0 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pulumi.com9
cortex.io7
spacelift.io7
apiiro.com6
facets.cloud6
checkthat.ai5
devopsplatforms.com5
envzero.com5
firefly.ai5
gartsolutions.com4

Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming env0 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pulumi.com/blog/infrastructure-as-code-tools8
cortex.io/post/best-infrastructure-as-code-iac-tools7
apiiro.com/blog/best-iac-tools6
facets.cloud/blog/top-8-infrastructure-as-code-iac-tools5
devopsplatforms.com/buying-guides/best-iac-tools4
envzero.com/blog/iac-tools-for-cloud-automation4
gartsolutions.com/infrastructure-as-code-tools4
guideflow.com/blog/infrastructure-as-code-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when env0's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as env0, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at env0.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack