Index › Products › Certbot + Let's Encrypt · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Certbot + Let's Encrypt

9Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Certbot + Let's Encrypt was named 3 times in Certificate management, where Sectigo Certificate Manager led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 120

under the label threshold

Mid-market10 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In certificate management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Certbot + Let's Encrypt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Certificate lifecycle management	Identity and access	4%	10 of 104	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sectigo Certificate Manager at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Certbot + Let's Encrypt yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Certbot + Let's Encrypt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have fewer than 50 certificates: Start with Certbot + Let's Encrypt - it's free and automated” MiniMax M2.5 · Certificate management · budget prompt · first choice

“The hands-down recommendation for startups / small environments with <~50 certs” Muse Glimmer 30B · Certificate management · budget prompt · first choice

“For startups with fewer than 50 certificates, Certbot + Let's Encrypt is free and automated.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Certificate management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Certbot + Let's Encrypt, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Certbot + Let's Encrypt was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sectigo SCM Pro6 of 90Not among the top eight

TrackSSL4 of 91Not among the top eight

QCecuring4 of 90Not among the top eight

CertKit3 of 92Not among the top eight

AppViewX CERT+3 of 90Not among the top eight

Keyfactor3 of 90Not among the top eight

Venafi3 of 90Not among the top eight

cert-manager3 of 90Not among the top eight

GlobalSign Atlas2 of 91Not among the top eight

Sectigo Certificate Manager2 of 91Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Certbot + Let's Encrypt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Certbot + Let's Encrypt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qcecuring.com9

slashdot.org7

g2.com6

gitnux.org5

infisical.com5

sourceforge.net5

verifyed.io5

cyberpress.org4

gartner.com4

keytos.io3

No domain is on file for Certbot + Let's Encrypt, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

qcecuring.com/blog/best-clm-platforms-20269

infisical.com/blog/best-certificate-management-tools5

slashdot.org/software/certificate-lifecycle-management/f-small-business5

verifyed.io/blog/certificate-management-tool5

cyberpress.org/certificate-lifecycle-pki-by-use-case4

gitnux.org/best/certificate-lifecycle-management-software4

gartner.com/reviews/market/certificate-lifecycle-management-clm3

keytos.io/blog/pki/the-best-certificate-lifecycle-management-according-to-g23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Certbot + Let's Encrypt

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Certbot + Let's Encrypt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Certbot + Let's Encrypt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Certbot + Let's Encrypt by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Certbot + Let's Encrypt is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Certbot + Let's Encrypt, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.