IT AI Index

Index › Products › Celoxis · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Celoxis

5Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Celoxis was named 5 times in IT financial mgmt and 1 other category, where Nicus ITFM Platform led with 9%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market25 of 159

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In it financial mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Celoxis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	25 of 159	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	2%	9 of 113	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Celoxis yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Celoxis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels2

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Freshservice (ITSM) + Celoxis (PPM)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IT financial mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Celoxis or Spendflo” MiniMax M2.5 · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Celoxis is a project portfolio management system that packs scheduling rigor, financial tracking, and configurable dashboards into a price mid-sized teams can defend” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“mid-market organizations should evaluate it when they want portfolio depth without enterprise-tier cost and complexity” Perplexity Sonar · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Celoxis, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Celoxis was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP LeanIX2 of 52Not among the top eight

ONES.com2 of 51Not among the top eight

ServiceNow APM2 of 50Not among the top eight

Spendflo2 of 50Not among the top eight

Ardoq1 of 50Not among the top eight

CAST Highlight1 of 50Not among the top eight

Epicflow1 of 50Not among the top eight

Flexera One1 of 50Not among the top eight

Freshservice1 of 50Not among the top eight

Jira Service Management1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Celoxis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Celoxis and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com5

ones.com5

bill.com3

celoxis.comYour site3

planisware.com3

portfoliohub.io3

quickbase.com3

spendflo.com3

us.fitgap.com3

faddom.com2

Thirty of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Celoxis came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/application-portfolio-management-software4

bill.com/blog/portfolio-management-software3

quickbase.com/blog/best-portfolio-management-software3

spendflo.com/blog/application-portfolio-management-tools3

faddom.com/application-portfolio-management-tools2

g2.com/categories/application-portfolio-management2

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-portfolio-management-tools2

ones.com/blog/application-portfolio-management-apm-tools-9-platforms-compared2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on celoxis.com

828

subdomains included

Content

513

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	412	58	2026-09-28
Comparison	63	10	2026-09-22
Case study	20	0	2026-01-21
Report or ebook	12	undated
Glossary or explainer	5	2	2026-08-12
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28Retail project management blog
2026-09-24Best project management software mcp blog
2026-09-22Industrial automation project management blog
2026-09-22Clickup alternatives comparison
2026-09-21Project management software south africa blog
2026-09-18Marine engineering project management blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page celoxis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Celoxis

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Celoxis; a claim can dispute any of them.

Celoxis (PPM) 1

Follow Celoxis

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Celoxis is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Enterprise Project & Portfolio Management Software
celoxis.com
For: PMOs and project-driven teams
celoxis.com
Price stated: Transparent, pay-per-user pricing - no add-on games, no feature gating. celoxis.com
Starting price: 10 celoxis.com
Free plan or trial: 14-day free trial celoxis.com
Integrations claimed: 400 celoxis.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPR-readySSO / SAMLAICPA SOC 2EU GDPRUK GDPRCSA
Hosting: U.S._Default_Europe_EU_U.S. DefaultEurope EUUnited StatesIreland (EU)
Customers named: McDonald'sGoodman FielderNexternMarkem-ImajeGroundProbeKnape & VogtSweetRushSangkuriang Internasional

What Celoxis's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: celoxis.com, celoxis.com/pricing, celoxis.com/security, celoxis.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Celoxis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Celoxis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Celoxis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Celoxis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Celoxis, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.