Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 11 of 44
2 categories · Named, not rankedCDNetworks
14Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CDNetworks was named 6 times in CDN and 1 other category, where Cloudflare led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market10 of 49
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 45
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In cdn · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CDNetworks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content delivery networks | Network and edge | 0% | 10 of 49 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 68% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Colocation providers | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 34 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TierPoint at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, CDNetworks held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CDN · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 of 43, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 10 of 49 |
| Colocation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 78, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CDNetworks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CDNetworks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“then considering CDNetworks, EdgeOne, or others if you have specific regional needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CDN · scale prompt · alternative
“CDNetworks: A leading CDN provider that offers a range of features” Llama 4 Maverick · CDN · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you want lower-touch support on a budget: CDNetworks” GPT-5.4 mini · Colocation · budget prompt · alternative
“stands out for APAC and mainland China delivery” Perplexity Sonar · CDN · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CDNetworks, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CDNetworks was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CDNetworks, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CDNetworks was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CDNetworks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named CDNetworks and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cdnetworks.comYour site12
blog.blazingcdn.com11
fastly.com8
affmaven.com5
edgeone.ai5
it-ai-index.com5
techradar.com5
33rdsquare.com4
cdnworld.com4
linkedin.com4
Fifty-one of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming CDNetworks came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cdnetworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CDNetworks takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare takes 68%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cdnetworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CDNetworks takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare takes 68%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cdn”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cdns”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“cdnetworks”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 27,830 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,340 · 119 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,089
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 10 of 49 in CDN
Segment leader
68%
Cloudflare
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cdnetworks.com
2,839
subdomains included
Content
581
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
50 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 243 | undated | CDN, SD-WAN | ||
| Blog | 144 | undated | CDN, WAF | ||
| News or press | 81 | undated | CDN, WAF | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 29 | undated | CDN | ||
| Case study | 26 | undated | Object storage, WAF | ||
| Podcast or video | 23 | undated | CDN | ||
| Report or ebook | 21 | undated | CDN, WAF | ||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | CDN, ZTNA | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cdnetworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow CDNetworks
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CDNetworks is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CDNetworks is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Industry-Leading CDN and Security Solutions
- For
- businesses
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial cdnetworks.com
- Customers named
- 17LIVE
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What CDNetworks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cdnetworks.com, cdnetworks.com/glossary/security, cdnetworks.com/products/ovp. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CDNetworks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CDNetworks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CDNetworks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CDNetworks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CDNetworks, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.