IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Broadcom DX APM · September 2026 Edition

Broadcom · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Broadcom DX APM

8Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Broadcom DX APM was named 3 times in APM, where New Relic led with 54%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business50 of 58

under the label threshold

Mid-market70 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 58

under the label threshold

In apm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Broadcom DX APM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Application performance monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	70 of 70	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Broadcom DX APM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Broadcom DX APM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“frequent gripes: high licensing ... outdated UI, complex installs, poor scalability ... spotty support” Grok 4.1 Fast · APM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Strong Avoid if you have a modern microservices architecture.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · APM · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Broadcom DX APM, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Broadcom DX APM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AppDynamics8 of 80Not in the top three

Datadog8 of 80Not in the top three

Dynatrace7 of 81Not in the top three

New Relic6 of 82Not in the top three

Grafana Cloud4 of 81Not in the top three

Grafana4 of 80Not in the top three

Prometheus4 of 80Not in the top three

Honeycomb3 of 80Not in the top three

Jaeger3 of 80Not in the top three

SigNoz3 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Broadcom DX APM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Broadcom DX APM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dev.to4

reddit.com4

apmdigest.com3

ardura.consulting3

dotcom-monitor.com3

g2.com3

medium.com3

openobserve.ai3

peerspot.com3

performance.qa3

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Broadcom DX APM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ardura.consulting/blog/apm-tools-comparison-20263

dev.to/openobserve/top-10-apm-tools-in-2026-a-complete-comparison-guide-57pi3

openobserve.ai/blog/top-10-apm-tools3

apmdigest.com/why-traditional-apm-tools-are-insufficient-for-modern-enterprise-application2

augmentcode.com/tools/best-apm-tools2

blazemeter.com/blog/apm-tools-comparison2

bugsink.com/blog/you-dont-need-application-performance-monitoring2

chronosphere.io/learn/apm-vendors-are-creating-confusion-about-observability-dont-fall-for2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Broadcom DX APM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Broadcom DX APM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Broadcom DX APM (formerly CA APM) 2CA APM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Broadcom DX APM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Broadcom DX APM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at broadcom.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.