Every category where a model named Attivo Networks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Deception technology	Security operations	0%	21 of 94	18%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Attivo Networks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Attivo Networks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Market leader (~18.5% market share in financial services)” MiniMax M2.5 · Deception · comparative prompt · first choice

“Pioneered identity deception and response, now integrated into SentinelOne's broader security platform.” Mistral Small · Deception · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best when you want deception as part of a larger endpoint/XDR/identity security platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · Deception · comparative prompt · alternative

“Attivo is the premium choice... Drawback: Pricing often skews toward the upper end” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Deception · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid trying to deploy Attivo as a standalone legacy network-deception platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Deception · negative prompt · hard negative

“Comprehensive but complex; better for larger orgs” Kimi K2 · Deception · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Attivo Networks, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Attivo Networks was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Acalvio ShadowPlex17 of 266Not among the top eight

Illusive Networks14 of 260Not among the top eight

TrapX Security9 of 261Not among the top eight

Thinkst Canary8 of 262Not among the top eight

CounterCraft7 of 260Not among the top eight

Fidelis Deception7 of 260Not among the top eight

SentinelOne Singularity6 of 260Not among the top eight

Smokescreen6 of 260Not among the top eight

Smokescreen Technologies6 of 260Not among the top eight

Cymmetria5 of 260Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Attivo Networks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 26 answers that named Attivo Networks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

acalvio.com14

dataintelo.com9

expertinsights.com9

guideflow.com9

myhospitalnow.com9

sourceforge.net9

verifiedmarketreports.com8

countercraftsec.com7

devopsschool.com7

growthmarketreports.com7

No domain is on file for Attivo Networks, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/network-security/best-deception-technology-companies9

guideflow.com/blog/deception-technology-software9

acalvio.com/preemptive-security/competitive-intelligence-cyber-deception8

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-deception-technology-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison7

linkedin.com/pulse/cyber-deception-technology-cisos-guide-choosing-right-anand-akela-zbmlc7

growthmarketreports.com/report/deception-technology-market6

marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/deception-technology-market-1075906

myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-deception-technology-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison-26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Attivo Networks stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 90 a month (“attivo networks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 94 in deception

Segment leader

37%

Thinkst Canary

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Attivo Networks

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Attivo Networks; a claim can dispute any of them.

Attivo Networks (SentinelOne) 3Attivo Networks (now part of SentinelOne) 1SentinelOne Singularity + Attivo Networks 1SentinelOne Singularity Hologram / Attivo Networks 1

Follow Attivo Networks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Attivo Networks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Attivo Networks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Attivo Networks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Attivo Networks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Attivo Networks, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.