Index › Products › alive-IT · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

alive-IT

2Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. alive-IT was named 1 time in Business continuity, where LogicManager led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market40 of 114

under the label threshold

Enterprise97 of 112

under the label threshold

In business continuity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named alive-IT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Business continuity management	Security operations	0%	40 of 114	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for alive-IT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated alive-IT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose ParaSolution or alive-IT if your priority is getting the program running quickly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Business continuity · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as alive-IT, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and alive-IT was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CLDigital 3602 of 20Not among the top eight

ParaSolution2 of 20Not among the top eight

ServiceNow BCM2 of 20Not among the top eight

Archer Resilience Management1 of 20Not among the top eight

Continuity21 of 20Not among the top eight

Drata1 of 20Not among the top eight

Fusion1 of 20Not among the top eight

Meridian BCMS1 of 20Not among the top eight

Ncontracts1 of 20Not among the top eight

Quantivate BCM1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named alive-IT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named alive-IT and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

em360tech.com2

gartner.com2

infotech.com2

riskpublishing.com2

bryghtpath.com1

capterra.com1

expertinsights.com1

faddom.com1

fortiv.io1

g2.com1

No domain is on file for alive-IT, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

em360tech.com/top-10/business-continuity-platforms2

gartner.com/reviews/market/business-continuity-management-program-solutions2

infotech.com/research/ss/business-continuity-management-software-selection-guide2

riskpublishing.com/best-business-continuity-management-software-compared2

bryghtpath.com/choosing-business-continuity-software1

capterra.com/resources/best-business-continuity-software1

expertinsights.com/backup-and-recovery/the-top-business-continuity-and-disaster-recovery-s1

expertinsights.com/backup-and-recovery/top-business-continuity-and-alerting-solutions1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as alive-IT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as alive-IT; a claim can dispute any of them.

alive-IT (Controllit AG) 1

Follow alive-IT

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when alive-IT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as alive-IT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for alive-IT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where alive-IT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name alive-IT, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.