Data security posture management · October 2026 Edition
Wiz vs BigID
Three of fourteen models named Wiz first on the direct prompt; zero named BigID. Wiz was named by eleven of the fourteen models and BigID by twelve and Wiz carries 29 labels and BigID 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in sixteen categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%24%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2933A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Wiz reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cyera was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview vs Wiz · Microsoft Purview vs BigID · Sentra vs Wiz
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data security posture management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WizFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBigID
Direct30
Paraphrase112 against BigID
Comparative221 against Wiz
Budget-constrained103 against Wiz · 3 against BigID
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Wiz · 3 against BigID
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Wiz and BigID stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Wiz BigID first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Wiz on the left and BigID on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Wiz and BigID stood in it.
Wiz first, BigID an alternative
3 of 14 modelsBigID was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashWiz alternatives: CrowdStrike, Cyera, Proofpoint DSPM, Sentra
Qwen 3.7 FlashWiz alternatives: Cyera, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security
Kimi K2Wiz alternatives: BigID, Varonis Data Security Platform
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarSentra alternatives: Concentric, Cyera, Prisma Cloud DSPM, Wiz
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Cyera alternatives: Netwrix, Normalyze, Sentra
GPT-5.4 miniVaronis Data Security Platform alternatives: Microsoft Purview, Teleskope
Grok 4.1 FastSentra alternatives: Concentric AI, Cyera, Varonis Data Security Platform
Mistral SmallSentra alternatives: Concentric, Cyera
DeepSeek V4 FlashSentra alternatives: Concentric AI, Cyera
Llama 4 MaverickConcentric, Cyera, Sentra
GLM 4.7 FlashXSecuriti, Varonis Data Security Platform alternatives: Cyera, Microsoft Purview
MiniMax M2.5Cyera, Sentra alternatives: Concentric, Forcepoint DSPM, Microsoft Purview
GPT-6 LunaWiz DSPM alternatives: Cyera, Microsoft Purview, Sentra
Muse Glimmer 30BSentra alternatives: Concentric AI, Cyera
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: BigID leads at enterprise.
BigID22%#2 of 11Wiz2%#8 of 11What the models said about Wiz
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about BigID
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“cannot afford massive, complex enterprise tools (like BigID, IBM Guardium, or Symantec DLP)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“avoid overkill platforms like Cyera or BigID ($50K+/yr minimums)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Prioritized affordability, ease of use, and hybrid support over enterprise-scale tools like BigID or Cyera” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“BigID and Trellix DLP are top recommendations due to their balance of advanced features, ease of use, and scalability” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Cyera or BigID if your priority is deep data discovery and classification across many data sources.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best breadth of data connectors and the deepest privacy/compliance automation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Purview vs WizMicrosoft Purview vs BigIDSentra vs WizSentra vs BigIDWiz vs CyeraWiz vs Varonis Data Security PlatformWiz vs IBM GuardiumWiz vs SecuritiCyera vs BigIDVaronis Data Security Platform vs BigIDIBM Guardium vs BigIDBigID vs SecuritiAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DSPM standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.