Auvik vs Nagios
Three of fourteen models named Auvik first on the direct prompt; zero named Nagios. Both were named by all fourteen models and Auvik carries 33 labels and Nagios 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.
By framing
AuvikFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNagios
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Auvik and Nagios were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 101 answers naming Auvik and the 156 naming Nagios. In those answers Nagios took the first choice zero times and Auvik one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Auvik Nagios first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Auvik on the left and Nagios on the right.The direct prompt
Auvik first, Nagios not the choice
3 of 14 modelsNagios was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Auvik
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend starting with Auvik if you have a decent IT budget and want the most polished, comprehensive network management + automation experience” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Go with Auvik if you have a lean IT team that needs instant visibility, automated network mapping, and hassle-free configuration backups” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Auvik or Domotz: These are cloud-based, incredibly easy to deploy... They are heavily favored by lean IT teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Nagios
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Nagios: Steer clear if you're not a highly technical user.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“often an open-source option like Zabbix or Nagios Core, as they provide robust features at zero licensing cost” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses, Zabbix and Nagios Core are the top free choices” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Nagios Xi - a broad network and infrastructure monitoring tool with sensor-level control, suitable for mid-market IT teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.