Zero of fourteen models named Holistic AI first on the direct prompt; one named IBM watsonx.governance. Holistic AI was named by eleven of the fourteen models and IBM watsonx.governance by fourteen and Holistic AI carries 22 labels and IBM watsonx.governance 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI governance platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Holistic AI and IBM watsonx.governance were named in the same answer fifty-one times, of the 79 answers naming Holistic AI and the 116 naming IBM watsonx.governance. In those answers IBM watsonx.governance took the first choice eight times and Holistic AI zero.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | IW | IW | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | IW | IW | IW | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | IW | IW | IW | IW | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | IW | IW | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | IW | IW | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | IW | IW | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | IW | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | IW | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | IW | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | IW | IW | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | IW |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to avoid ... Holistic AI – starts around $40K/year for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Holistic AI | Custom quotes | No self-serve pricing” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“typically custom / enterprise pricing, often $25K-$250K+/year, and "pricing structure is less accessible for small teams"” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Start with a trial of Credo AI or Holistic AI if your priority is commercial compliance and customer trust.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Pairs technical risk libraries with regulator-aligned assessment workflows; good for enterprise risk quantification” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Organizations focused on detailed model risk management and independent auditing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to avoid ... IBM watsonx.governance – enterprise pricing, usually $75K+” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Real-world user reviews frequently highlight a steep learning curve, complex initial setup, high licensing costs, and difficulties integrating with non-IBM or third-party tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“IBM watsonx.governance has been flagged for: High cost and complex licensing; Steep learning curve ... Lack of documentation and training opportunities” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose IBM watsonx.governance if you want transparent pricing and need to govern both traditional ML and LLMs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Need policy, audit, compliance, and approvals? Start with IBM watsonx.governance.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“End-to-end lifecycle governance within IBM's watsonx ecosystem... Geared toward large orgs wanting integrated governance” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.