Index › Identity and access › NHI management › JumpCloud vs Delinea

Non-human identity management · October 2026 Edition

JumpCloud vs Delinea

Five of fourteen models named JumpCloud first on the direct prompt; zero named Delinea. JumpCloud was named by eight of the fourteen models and Delinea by eight and both carry 12 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

JumpCloud

accepted challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

Delinea

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share14%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate8%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.

Labels1212Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, JumpCloud reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.JumpCloud vs Entro Security · JumpCloud vs GitGuardian NHI Governance · JumpCloud vs Akeyless

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the non-human identity management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

JumpCloudFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDelinea

Direct50

Paraphrase03

Comparative00

Budget-constrained10

Scale-constrained00

Negative001 against JumpCloud

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where JumpCloud and Delinea stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B

JumpCloud

Delinea

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, JumpCloud on the left and Delinea on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where JumpCloud and Delinea stood in it.

JumpCloud first, Delinea an alternative

5 of 14 modelsDelinea was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Claude Haiku 4.5JumpCloud alternatives: Delinea, HashiCorp Vault, Natoma, Oasis Security

Grok 4.1 FastJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless, Astrix Security, One Identity

Qwen 3.7 FlashJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless, One Identity

Kimi K2JumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, P0 Security

MiniMax M2.5JumpCloud alternatives: Oasis Security, One Identity, Saviynt Identity Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Muse Glimmer 30BEntro Security, Oasis alternatives: Aembit, AppViewX, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Defakto, HashiCorp Vault, JumpCloud, Keyfactor, Venafi

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniEntro Security alternatives: Akeyless, One Identity Manager

Gemini 3.5 FlashEntro Security alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless, Oasis Security

Perplexity SonarFrontegg alternatives: Descope, OneLogin, Stytch, WorkOS

Mistral SmallAembit alternatives: Entro Security, Oasis Security

DeepSeek V4 FlashToken Security alternatives: Astrix Security, Entro Security

Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: One Identity

GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID alternatives: KeeperPAM, Oasis Security, One Identity

GPT-6 LunaToken Security alternatives: Aembit, Astrix Security, Cisco, Cyera, Entro Security, Oasis, SailPoint

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

JumpCloud leads by eighteen points.

JumpCloud#1 of 17

Delinea#11 of 17

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

JumpCloud leads by seven points.

JumpCloud#1 of 16

Delinea#6 of 16

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

JumpCloud leads by two points.

JumpCloud#– of 15

Delinea#– of 15

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about JumpCloud

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“JumpCloud is recommended for mid-market and enterprise IT teams looking to consolidate point tools, offering unified NHI lifecycle management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Delinea

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“I would recommend Delinea as the best *single-platform* starting point” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Delinea (formerly Thycotic/Centrify) is the most recommended tool.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: Delinea (Secret Server Cloud)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

Also compared

JumpCloud vs Entro Security JumpCloud vs GitGuardian NHI Governance JumpCloud vs Akeyless JumpCloud vs HashiCorp Vault JumpCloud vs Aembit JumpCloud vs Token Security Entro Security vs Delinea GitGuardian NHI Governance vs Delinea Akeyless vs Delinea HashiCorp Vault vs Delinea Delinea vs Aembit Delinea vs Token Security All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full NHI management standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.